Suppr超能文献

按种族和族裔对乳腺癌队列进行的临床试验讨论与参与情况

Clinical Trial Discussion and Participation in a Breast Cancer Cohort by Race and Ethnicity.

作者信息

Chen Nan, Freeman Jincong Q, Zhao Fangyuan, Goldberg Leah, Yarlagadda Sudha R, Terman Elizabeth, Huo Dezheng, Nanda Rita

机构信息

Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515205. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15205.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer clinical trial participation pose a significant barrier to providing equitable care. Black and Hispanic patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, and an improved understanding of barriers to enrollment is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To examine patterns of clinical trial discussion and participation and patient attitudes toward clinical trial participation in a diverse cohort of patients with breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used survey data from patients enrolled in the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort. Patients were queried about clinical trial discussion and subsequent enrollment in a therapeutic clinical trial. Barriers to trial enrollment were also assessed. Surveys were conducted from July to September 2022, and data were analyzed from February to October 2024.

EXPOSURE

Self-reported race and ethnicity, including Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes of interest were discussing participation in a breast cancer clinical trial with a health care practitioner, participating in a clinical trial, and barriers to trial enrollment.

RESULTS

Of 1150 respondents (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [11.9] years), 51 (4.4%) were Asian, 224 (19.5%) were Black, 35 (3.1%) were Hispanic, and 838 (73.0%) were White. A total of 447 respondents (38.9%) reported discussing trial participation with a health care practitioner. There were no differences in trial discussion between White patients and other racial groups (Asian: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.31-1.82; Black: AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.78-2.21; Hispanic: AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.26-2.08). Among 443 patients offered a trial, 285 (64.3%) participated. While there were differences in trial participation across racial and ethnic groups, these differences were not significant after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Among 158 patients who did not enroll in the trial offered, 37 (23.4%) reported ineligibility, 17 (10.8%) were worried about the possibility of getting a placebo, 16 (10.1%) were worried about extra time required, and 14 (8.9%) were worried about possible adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study demonstrated that when offered, patients across racial and ethnic groups were equally likely to participate in clinical trials. In addition to ineligibility, time toxicity was a significant barrier to enrollment. These data provide valuable insights that can serve as a roadmap for how to expand access to trials for all patients, regardless of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic background.

摘要

重要性

乳腺癌临床试验参与方面的种族和族裔差异对提供公平医疗构成了重大障碍。黑人和西班牙裔患者在临床试验中的代表性不足,因此需要更好地了解入组障碍。

目的

研究不同种族乳腺癌患者群体中临床试验讨论和参与的模式以及患者对参与临床试验的态度。

设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了芝加哥多族裔流行病学乳腺癌队列中患者的调查数据。询问患者关于临床试验讨论以及随后参与治疗性临床试验的情况。还评估了试验入组的障碍。调查于2022年7月至9月进行,数据分析于2024年2月至10月进行。

暴露因素

自我报告的种族和族裔,包括亚洲人、黑人、西班牙裔和白人。

主要结局和测量指标

感兴趣的结局包括与医疗保健从业者讨论参与乳腺癌临床试验、参与临床试验以及试验入组的障碍。

结果

在1150名受访者(平均[标准差]年龄为53.7[11.9]岁)中,51名(4.4%)为亚洲人,224名(19.5%)为黑人,35名(3.1%)为西班牙裔,838名(73.0%)为白人。共有447名受访者(38.9%)报告与医疗保健从业者讨论过试验参与情况。白人患者与其他种族群体在试验讨论方面没有差异(亚洲人:调整后的优势比[AOR]为0.75;95%置信区间为0.31 - 1.82;黑人:AOR为1.31;95%置信区间为0.78 - 2.21;西班牙裔:AOR为0.73;95%置信区间为0.26 - 2.08)。在443名被提供试验机会的患者中,285名(64.3%)参与了试验。虽然不同种族和族裔群体在试验参与方面存在差异,但在调整社会人口学和临床因素后,这些差异并不显著。在158名未参加所提供试验的患者中,37名(23.4%)报告不符合资格,17名(10.8%)担心可能会得到安慰剂,16名(10.1%)担心需要额外的时间,14名(8.9%)担心可能的不良反应。

结论及意义

这项横断面研究表明,当有机会时,不同种族和族裔群体的患者参与临床试验的可能性相同。除了不符合资格外,时间毒性是入组的一个重要障碍。这些数据提供了宝贵的见解,可作为如何扩大所有患者参与试验机会的路线图,无论其种族、族裔和社会经济背景如何。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022.2022 年乳腺癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Nov;72(6):524-541. doi: 10.3322/caac.21754. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
10
Financial Toxicity and Equitable Access to Clinical Trials.经济毒性与临床试验的公平可及性
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:11-18. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_100019. Epub 2019 May 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验