Larsen Sif Binder, Offersen Cecilie Mørck, Dyrberg Eva, Johansen Jens Kurt, Lange Naja Bjørslev, Bech Birthe Højlund, Nielsen Michael Bachmann, Torp-Pedersen Søren Tobias
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 26;15(11):1339. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111339.
Intermetatarsal bursitis (IMB) is emerging as a diagnostic consideration for patients with forefoot pain. However, few investigations have been conducted into the incidence of IMB among patients with forefoot pain. The symptoms of IMB are described as mimicking those of Morton's neuroma (MN). Currently, the best method to differentiate between MN and IMB is radiological evaluation. Based on this, the aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of IMB and MN in a prospective cohort of patients with intermetatarsal pain diagnosed with radiological evaluation and compared to a control group. This study included 26 patients and 13 controls. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) of one forefoot. Among the 26 patients, 5 (19.2%) had MN and 14 (53.8%) had IMB on MRI compared to US, with which 25 (96.2%) cases of IMB and 0 with MN were identified. In the control group, both modalities found asymptomatic web space pathology in four cases (30.8%), and US identified normal intermetatarsal bursas in five cases. Additionally, our results indicate that MN patients have more severe pain and a longer history of pain compared to IMB patients. Based on our MRI results, we conclude that IMB is frequent in patients with intermetatarsal pain. Differentiation between MN and IMB with US is complex and should be performed with caution and an understanding of both conditions. Normal intermetatarsal bursas are also visible on US as hypoechoic but non-expansive masses.
跖间滑囊炎(IMB)正逐渐成为前足疼痛患者的一个诊断考虑因素。然而,针对前足疼痛患者中IMB的发病率,所开展的调查却很少。IMB的症状被描述为与莫顿神经瘤(MN)的症状相似。目前,区分MN和IMB的最佳方法是影像学评估。基于此,本研究的目的是在一个经影像学评估诊断为跖间疼痛的前瞻性队列患者中调查IMB和MN的发病率,并与一个对照组进行比较。本研究纳入了26例患者和13名对照。所有参与者均对一只前足进行了磁共振成像(MRI)和超声(US)检查。在26例患者中,与超声检查相比,MRI显示5例(19.2%)患有MN,14例(53.8%)患有IMB,其中超声检查确定25例(96.2%)为IMB,0例为MN。在对照组中,两种检查方法均在4例(30.8%)中发现无症状的蹼间隙病变,超声检查在5例中发现跖间滑囊正常。此外,我们的结果表明,与IMB患者相比,MN患者疼痛更严重,疼痛病史更长。基于我们的MRI结果,我们得出结论,IMB在跖间疼痛患者中很常见。用超声区分MN和IMB很复杂,应谨慎进行,并对两种情况都有所了解。正常的跖间滑囊在超声检查中也表现为低回声但无扩张的肿块。