Wang Junrui, Li Haimei, Gong Dehong, Liu Xiujun, Liu Bingqi, Guo Xiao
College of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Changcheng Road NO. 700, Qingdao 266109, China.
College of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China.
Plants (Basel). 2025 May 30;14(11):1667. doi: 10.3390/plants14111667.
Drought is one of the main environmental disturbances limiting the growth and production of turfgrass in China and around the world. To study the performance under drought conditions of different mixing ratios ( L., Keng., L.), a water-controlled pot experiment was conducted. The mixing ratios used were 2:3:5, 2:6:2, and 2:2:6 for , , and , respectively. The relative water content (RWC), proline (Pro) content, and other physiological and ecological variables of three turfgrass monocultures and their three ratio mixtures (a total of six different treatments) were measured under drought as well as dust stress at various time points. The results revealed that, under drought stress, the dust retention performance of the mixing ratio treatments was better than the monocultures, with the best performance in the 2:6:2 mix and the worst in the monoculture. Additionally, during the 21 days of drought stress, as time increased, the appearance quality (TQ) of the turfgrass gradually declined over time; its RWC gradually decreased; its chlorophyll (Chl) content, peroxidase (POD) activity, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity all showed a trend of initially increasing then decreasing; and its soluble sugar (Sol), malondialdehyde (MDA), and Pro content increased continuously. A comprehensive evaluation of physiological and ecological variables, using the membership function method, showed that the six types of turfgrass treatments ranked as follows (from strongest to weakest) in drought resistance: 2:6:2 mix > monoculture > 2:3:5 mix > 2:2:6 mix > monoculture > monoculture. The dust retention capability was assessed through quantitative measurements, and the ranking of dust retention amounts in descending order was as follows: > 2:6:2 mix > 2:2:6 mix > > > 2:3:5 mix. We conclude that, in practical applications, the degree of drought can be appropriately controlled within a certain range to achieve maximum dust retention benefits from turfgrass.
干旱是限制中国乃至全球草坪草生长和产量的主要环境干扰因素之一。为研究不同混合比例(高羊茅、黑麦草、草地早熟禾)在干旱条件下的表现,进行了控水盆栽试验。高羊茅、黑麦草、草地早熟禾的混合比例分别为2:3:5、2:6:2和2:2:6。在干旱以及沙尘胁迫的不同时间点,测量了三种草坪草单播及其三种比例混合(共六种不同处理)的相对含水量(RWC)、脯氨酸(Pro)含量以及其他生理和生态变量。结果表明,在干旱胁迫下,混合比例处理的滞尘性能优于单播,其中2:6:2混合表现最佳,高羊茅单播最差。此外,在21天的干旱胁迫期间,随着时间增加,草坪草的外观质量(TQ)逐渐下降;其RWC逐渐降低;叶绿素(Chl)含量、过氧化物酶(POD)活性和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性均呈现先升高后降低的趋势;其可溶性糖(Sol)、丙二醛(MDA)和Pro含量持续增加。采用隶属函数法对生理和生态变量进行综合评价,结果表明,六种草坪草处理在抗旱性方面的排名如下(从强到弱):2:6:2混合>草地早熟禾单播>2:3:5混合>2:2:6混合>高羊茅单播>黑麦草单播。通过定量测量评估滞尘能力,滞尘量从高到低的排名如下:草地早熟禾>2:6:2混合>2:2:6混合>黑麦草>高羊茅>2:3:5混合。我们得出结论,在实际应用中,可以将干旱程度在一定范围内适当控制,以使草坪草实现最大的滞尘效益。