• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绿海龟胃肠道微生物群的特征():一项系统综述。

Characterisation of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Green Sea Turtles (): A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ghafoor Dawood, Hayakijkosol Orachun, Ewels Carla, Kinobe Robert

机构信息

Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.

Centre for Tropical Biosecurity, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(11):1594. doi: 10.3390/ani15111594.

DOI:10.3390/ani15111594
PMID:40509060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12153662/
Abstract

The gut microbiome of sea turtles is essential for their ecological resilience and adaptation to environmental stressors. We hypothesised that different gut microbial profiles existed between green sea turtles kept in captivity and those in the wild. The aim of this systematic review was to determine dominant bacterial phyla in the gut microbiomes of wild and captive green sea turtles. Comparison of the top four bacterial phyla revealed that Bacillota was the most abundant phylum in captive turtles (40.9-87.5%), but it only ranked second (3.5-57.8%) in wild turtles. Bacteroidota had comparable relative abundance in captive (8.7-45.6%) and wild (3.6-43.1%) populations. By contrast, the relative abundance of Pseudomonadota was higher in wild turtles (6.2-68.1%) compared to the captive population (0.1-6.6%). Verrucomicrobiota was less prevalent in wild and captive populations, with relative abundances ranging from 0.28 to 5.4% and 2.3 to 7.2%, respectively. These findings highlight a putative gut microbial shift between wild and captive green sea turtle populations. This shift may be shaped by variations in environmental factors in captivity or the wild. Nonetheless, the significance of these putative changes is still unknown; the potential to use microbial shifts to guide management, rehabilitation, and conservation of green sea turtles is promising, but remains limited.

摘要

海龟的肠道微生物群对其生态恢复力和适应环境压力至关重要。我们假设,圈养的绿海龟和野生绿海龟的肠道微生物特征存在差异。本系统评价的目的是确定野生和圈养绿海龟肠道微生物群中的优势细菌门。对四大细菌门的比较显示,芽孢杆菌门是圈养海龟中最丰富的门类(40.9 - 87.5%),但在野生海龟中仅排名第二(3.5 - 57.8%)。拟杆菌门在圈养(8.7 - 45.6%)和野生(3.6 - 43.1%)种群中的相对丰度相当。相比之下,野生海龟中变形菌门的相对丰度(6.2 - 68.1%)高于圈养种群(0.1 - 6.6%)。疣微菌门在野生和圈养种群中不太常见,相对丰度分别为0.28%至5.4%和2.3%至7.2%。这些发现凸显了野生和圈养绿海龟种群之间可能存在的肠道微生物变化。这种变化可能是由圈养或野生环境因素的差异所导致的。尽管如此,这些假定变化的意义仍然未知;利用微生物变化来指导绿海龟的管理、康复和保护具有前景,但仍很有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce84/12153662/0837a9fbbb93/animals-15-01594-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce84/12153662/704e27651739/animals-15-01594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce84/12153662/96f8597bb55a/animals-15-01594-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce84/12153662/0837a9fbbb93/animals-15-01594-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce84/12153662/704e27651739/animals-15-01594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce84/12153662/96f8597bb55a/animals-15-01594-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce84/12153662/0837a9fbbb93/animals-15-01594-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterisation of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Green Sea Turtles (): A Systematic Review.绿海龟胃肠道微生物群的特征():一项系统综述。
Animals (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(11):1594. doi: 10.3390/ani15111594.
2
Fast acquisition of a polysaccharide fermenting gut microbiome by juvenile green turtles Chelonia mydas after settlement in coastal habitats.幼体绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)在沿海栖息地定居后,快速获得多糖发酵肠道微生物组。
Microbiome. 2018 Apr 10;6(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0454-z.
3
Metagenomic comparison of gut communities between hawksbills (Eretmochelys imbricata) and green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas).皱龟(Eretmochelys imbricata)和绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)肠道菌群的宏基因组比较。
Arch Microbiol. 2022 Jul 3;204(8):450. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03073-8.
4
Comparative analysis of gut bacterial communities of green turtles (Chelonia mydas) pre-hospitalization and post-rehabilitation by high-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA gene.高通量测序细菌 16S rRNA 基因分析绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)住院前和康复后的肠道细菌群落比较分析。
Microbiol Res. 2018 Mar;207:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Fecal bacterial communities of wild-captured and stranded green turtles (Chelonia mydas) on the Great Barrier Reef.大堡礁上野生捕获及搁浅的绿海龟(蠵龟)的粪便细菌群落
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017 Dec 1;93(12). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix139.
6
Trace Element Concentrations in Blood and Scute Tissues from Wild and Captive Hawaiian Green Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas).野生和圈养夏威夷绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)血液和龟甲组织中的微量元素浓度。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Jan;40(1):208-218. doi: 10.1002/etc.4911. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
7
Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial communities of hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) and green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas).玳瑁(Eretmochelys imbricata)和绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)粪便细菌群落的比较分析。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2022 Sep 20;369(1). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnac073.
8
Blood and cloacal microbiome profile of captive green turtles (Chelonia mydas) and hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata): Water quality and conservation implications.圈养绿海龟(蠵龟)和玳瑁(玳瑁)的血液和泄殖腔微生物群特征:水质及保护意义
Chemosphere. 2025 Apr;375:144223. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144223. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
9
Research on antibiotic resistance genes in wild and artificially bred green turtles (Chelonia mydas).野生和人工养殖绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)中抗生素耐药基因的研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 1;954:176716. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176716. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
10
Comparison of the intestinal flora of wild and artificial breeding green turtles ().野生与人工养殖绿海龟肠道菌群的比较()。 (注:括号内内容原文缺失,无法完整准确翻译)
Front Microbiol. 2024 May 30;15:1412015. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1412015. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
in the gastrointestinal tract as a modifier of human health.在胃肠道中作为人类健康的调节剂。
Gut Microbes. 2024 Jan-Dec;16(1):2406379. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2406379. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
2
Parabacteroides distasonis regulates the infectivity and pathogenicity of SVCV at different water temperatures.拟杆菌属 distasonis 在不同水温下调节 SVCV 的感染力和致病性。
Microbiome. 2024 Jul 17;12(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01799-9.
3
Potential impacts of environmental bacteria on the microbiota of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green (Chelonia mydas) sea turtle eggs and their hatching success.
环境细菌对红海龟(Caretta caretta)和绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)卵及其孵化成功率的微生物群的潜在影响。
Microbiologyopen. 2023 Jun;12(3):e1363. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1363.
4
Bacterial Infections in Sea Turtles.海龟的细菌感染
Vet Sci. 2023 May 6;10(5):333. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10050333.
5
The impact of culture systems on the gut microbiota and gut metabolome of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis).养殖系统对鳙鱼(Hypophthalmichthys nobilis)肠道微生物群和肠道代谢组的影响。
Anim Microbiome. 2023 Apr 1;5(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42523-023-00239-7.
6
Alleviates Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome in Mice.减轻小鼠的持续性炎症、免疫抑制和分解代谢综合征。
Metabolites. 2023 Jan 28;13(2):194. doi: 10.3390/metabo13020194.
7
Microbial composition of carapace, feces, and water column in captive juvenile green sea turtles with carapacial ulcers.患有背甲溃疡的圈养幼年绿海龟的背甲、粪便和水柱中的微生物组成
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 15;9:1039519. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1039519. eCollection 2022.
8
Prevalence and distribution of antimicrobial resistance in effluent wastewater from animal slaughter facilities: A systematic review.动物屠宰场污水中抗菌药物耐药性的流行状况和分布:系统评价。
Environ Pollut. 2023 Feb 1;318:120848. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120848. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Red, Gold and Green: Microbial Contribution of Rhodophyta and Other Algae to Green Turtle () Gut Microbiome.红、金与绿:红藻及其他藻类对绿海龟肠道微生物组的微生物贡献
Microorganisms. 2022 Oct 8;10(10):1988. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10101988.
10
What lives on and in the sea turtle? A literature review of sea turtle bacterial microbiota.海龟身上和体内有什么?海龟细菌微生物群的文献综述。
Anim Microbiome. 2022 Sep 8;4(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00202-y.