• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习评估血管性认知障碍并识别影像学标志物:一项多模态磁共振成像研究

Evaluation of vascular cognitive impairment and identification of imaging markers using machine learning: a multimodal MRI study.

作者信息

He Haoying, Lu Dongwei, Peng Sisi, Jiang Jiu, Fan Fan, Sun Dong, Sun Tianqi, Xu Zhipeng, Zhang Ping, Peng Xiaoxiang, Lei Ming, Zhang Junjian

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Department of Neuropsychology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 May 29;16:1505739. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1505739. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1505739
PMID:40510211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12158719/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is prevalent but underdiagnosed due to its heterogeneous nature and the lack of reliable diagnostic tools. Machine learning (ML) enhances disease evaluation by enabling accurate prediction and early detection from complex data. This study aimed to develop ML models to detect VCI using clinical data and multimodal MRI, and to explore the associations between imaging markers and cognitive function.

METHODS

The study enrolled 313 participants from Wuhan and surrounding areas, including 157 patients with VCI (age 62.38 ± 6.62 years, education 10.83 ± 3.00 years) and 156 cognitively normal individuals with vascular risk factors (age 59.93 ± 6.74 years, education 13.97 ± 3.19 years). An independent dataset of 82 participants was used for external validation. Clinical data, neuropsychological assessments, and MRIs (T1, T2-FLAIR, and DTI) were collected. After imaging processing and preliminary model selection, optimal models using various data modalities were constructed. Model reduction was undertaken to simplify models without sacrificing performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations and moDel Agnostic Language for Exploration and eXplanation were used for model interpretation.

RESULTS

The comprehensive final model integrating clinical and multimodal MRI measures achieved the best performance with eight input variables (AUC of 0.956, 95%CI 0.919-0.988 for internal and 0.919, 95%CI 0.866-0.966 for external validation). During external validation, DTI demonstrated more stable performance than T1 and T2-FLAIR imaging, highlighting its potential importance over conventional imaging markers. Key imaging markers, especially along the lateral cholinergic pathway, were highlighted for their importance in diagnosing VCI and understanding its manifestation.

CONCLUSION

Our study developed and validated accurate ML models for VCI detection, emphasizing the importance of DTI. The identified imaging markers, particularly those derived from DTI, underscoring the potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and understanding cognitive impairments related to vascular changes.

摘要

背景

血管性认知障碍(VCI)很常见,但由于其异质性和缺乏可靠的诊断工具,目前诊断不足。机器学习(ML)通过对复杂数据进行准确预测和早期检测,增强了疾病评估能力。本研究旨在开发利用临床数据和多模态磁共振成像(MRI)检测VCI的ML模型,并探索影像标志物与认知功能之间的关联。

方法

本研究招募了来自武汉及周边地区的313名参与者,包括157例VCI患者(年龄62.38±6.62岁,受教育年限10.83±3.00年)和156名有血管危险因素的认知正常个体(年龄59.93±6.74岁,受教育年限13.97±3.19年)。使用一个包含82名参与者的独立数据集进行外部验证。收集了临床数据、神经心理学评估结果和MRI(T1、T2-FLAIR和DTI)数据。在进行影像处理和初步模型选择后,构建了使用各种数据模式的最优模型。进行模型简化以在不牺牲性能的情况下简化模型。使用SHapley加性解释和探索与解释的模型无关语言进行模型解释。

结果

整合临床和多模态MRI测量的综合最终模型在八个输入变量下表现最佳(内部验证的AUC为0.956,95%CI为0.919-0.988;外部验证的AUC为0.919,95%CI为0.866-0.966)。在外部验证期间,DTI表现出比T1和T2-FLAIR成像更稳定的性能,突出了其相对于传统影像标志物的潜在重要性。关键影像标志物,特别是沿外侧胆碱能通路的标志物,因其在诊断VCI和理解其表现方面的重要性而受到关注。

结论

我们研究开发并验证了用于VCI检测的准确ML模型,强调了DTI的重要性。所确定的影像标志物,特别是那些来自DTI的标志物,突出了其在提高诊断准确性和理解与血管变化相关的认知障碍方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/2073754085c9/fneur-16-1505739-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/6aaae31ea64a/fneur-16-1505739-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/8f486532d6ef/fneur-16-1505739-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/8c119073709a/fneur-16-1505739-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/2073754085c9/fneur-16-1505739-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/6aaae31ea64a/fneur-16-1505739-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/8f486532d6ef/fneur-16-1505739-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/8c119073709a/fneur-16-1505739-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7ea/12158719/2073754085c9/fneur-16-1505739-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of vascular cognitive impairment and identification of imaging markers using machine learning: a multimodal MRI study.使用机器学习评估血管性认知障碍并识别影像学标志物:一项多模态磁共振成像研究
Front Neurol. 2025 May 29;16:1505739. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1505739. eCollection 2025.
2
Structural network efficiency mediates the association between glymphatic function and cognition in mild VCI: a DTI-ALPS study.结构网络效率介导轻度血管性认知障碍中脑淋巴功能与认知之间的关联:一项基于扩散张量成像-动脉自旋标记灌注成像的研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Nov 16;14:974114. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.974114. eCollection 2022.
3
Unsupervised machine learning model to predict cognitive impairment in subcortical ischemic vascular disease.无监督机器学习模型预测皮质下缺血性血管病认知障碍。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Aug;19(8):3327-3338. doi: 10.1002/alz.12971. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
4
A multimodal MRI-based machine learning framework for classifying cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease.一种基于多模态磁共振成像的机器学习框架,用于对脑小血管病中的认知障碍进行分类。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 16;15(1):13112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97552-9.
5
Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging on brain structure and function changes in vascular cognitive impairment without dementia.多模态磁共振成像对非痴呆型血管性认知障碍脑结构和功能变化的研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Nov 16;15:1278390. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1278390. eCollection 2023.
6
Symptomatic Treatment of Vascular Cognitive Impairment (STREAM-VCI): Protocol for a Cross-Over Trial.血管性认知障碍的对症治疗(STREAM-VCI):一项交叉试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Mar 20;7(3):e80. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9192.
7
Multiparametric MRI-Based Interpretable Radiomics Machine Learning Model Differentiates Medulloblastoma and Ependymoma in Children: A Two-Center Study.基于多参数 MRI 的可解释放射组学机器学习模型鉴别儿童髓母细胞瘤和室管膜瘤:一项双中心研究。
Acad Radiol. 2024 Aug;31(8):3384-3396. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.02.040. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
8
Graph Convolutional Network for AD and MCI Diagnosis Utilizing Peripheral DNA Methylation: Réseau de neurones en graphes pour le diagnostic de la MA et du TCL à l'aide de la méthylation de l'ADN périphérique.利用外周血DNA甲基化的阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍诊断的图卷积网络:使用外周血DNA甲基化进行阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍诊断的图神经网络
Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;69(12):869-879. doi: 10.1177/07067437241300947. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
9
Contribution of diffusion, perfusion and functional MRI to the disconnection hypothesis in subcortical vascular cognitive impairment.弥散、灌注和功能 MRI 对皮质下血管性认知障碍失连接假说的贡献。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Feb 28;3(3):131-139. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000080. eCollection 2018 Sep.
10
Cognitive and neuroimaging markers for preclinical vascular cognitive impairment.临床前血管性认知障碍的认知和神经影像学标志物。
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2021 Oct 5;2:100029. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2021.100029. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: a narrative review.血管性认知障碍与痴呆:一篇叙述性综述。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2024 Sep 23;18:e20230116. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0116. eCollection 2024.
2
Imaging Biomarkers of VCI: A Focused Update.血管性认知障碍的影像学生物标志物:重点更新。
Stroke. 2024 Apr;55(4):791-800. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044171. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Predicting delayed remission in Cushing's disease using radiomics models: a multi-center study.使用影像组学模型预测库欣病的延迟缓解:一项多中心研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 9;13:1218897. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1218897. eCollection 2023.
4
Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease-advances since 2013.神经影像学在小血管疾病研究中的标准——2013 年以来的进展。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Jul;22(7):602-618. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00131-X. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
The Current and Future State of AI Interpretation of Medical Images.医学图像人工智能解读的现状与未来发展态势
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 25;388(21):1981-1990. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2301725.
6
Cerebral Small Vessel Disease-Related Dementia: More Questions Than Answers.脑小血管病相关痴呆:问题多于答案。
Stroke. 2023 Mar;54(3):648-660. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038265. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
7
Unsupervised machine learning model to predict cognitive impairment in subcortical ischemic vascular disease.无监督机器学习模型预测皮质下缺血性血管病认知障碍。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Aug;19(8):3327-3338. doi: 10.1002/alz.12971. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
8
Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection.联邦学习为罕见癌症边界检测提供大数据支持。
Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 5;13(1):7346. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33407-5.
9
Educational attainment, structural brain reserve and Alzheimer's disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis.受教育程度、结构脑储备与阿尔茨海默病:孟德尔随机分析。
Brain. 2023 May 2;146(5):2059-2074. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac392.
10
A Review of Feature Selection Methods for Machine Learning-Based Disease Risk Prediction.基于机器学习的疾病风险预测的特征选择方法综述
Front Bioinform. 2022 Jun 27;2:927312. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.927312. eCollection 2022.