Cabo Carolina A, Hernández-Beltrán Víctor, Fernandes Orlando, Mendes Cláudia, Gamonales José M, Espada Mário C, Parraca José A
Departamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Front Physiol. 2025 May 29;16:1540776. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1540776. eCollection 2025.
As people age, maintaining physical fitness becomes essential for preserving independence, preventing falls, and improving overall quality of life. Physical activity (PA) mitigates the physical decline associated with aging, enhancing balance, strength, flexibility, and coordination. Effective exercise programs for older people should address age-related physical challenges while remaining safe and accessible.
This study aims to identify the most effective PA program to enhance the physical capacities of older people. By comparing training modalities such as Pilates, Aqua Aerobic, and Sensorimotor training, the study evaluates their impact on key physical abilities to determine the optimal program for promoting functional independence and reducing injury risk in older people.
This study examined 153 participants, divided into a Control Group (N = 44), Sensorimotor Group (N = 46), Aqua Aerobic Group (N = 41), and Pilates Group (N = 22). Over a 24-week intervention, physical capacities were assessed using the Rikli and Jones battery for strength and flexibility and the timed-up-and-go test for agility and speed. Data were collected pre- and post-intervention. To analyze the changes, we used Student's T-test and Cohen's d for effect size (ES), with statistical significance set at < 0.05. Additionally, ANOVA was applied to examine the main effects of time, group, and their interaction, with Partial Eta Squared used to determine the effect size (ES) in these comparisons.
The Sensorimotor Group showed significant gains in all tests ( < 0.05), while the Aqua Aerobic Group showed improvements in the Stand and Sit with and without Leaning ( < 0.001), Forearm Flexion ( = 0.005), and Reach Behind your Back ( = 0.002). In contrast, the Control and Pilates Groups did not exhibit significant improvements in any of the assessed variables. The analysis of the moment*group interaction effect revealed significant differences among the groups, except for the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test.
In conclusion, sensorimotor and aquatic training significantly improved physical function, especially balance, strength, and mobility, in older people.
随着人们年龄的增长,保持身体健康对于维持独立生活、预防跌倒以及提高整体生活质量至关重要。体育活动(PA)可减轻与衰老相关的身体机能衰退,增强平衡能力、力量、柔韧性和协调性。针对老年人的有效锻炼计划应在确保安全且易于实施的同时,应对与年龄相关的身体挑战。
本研究旨在确定最有效的体育活动计划,以增强老年人的身体能力。通过比较普拉提、水中有氧运动和感觉运动训练等训练方式,该研究评估它们对关键身体能力的影响,以确定促进老年人功能独立和降低受伤风险的最佳计划。
本研究对153名参与者进行了检查,分为对照组(N = 44)、感觉运动组(N = 46)、水中有氧组(N = 41)和普拉提组(N = 22)。在为期24周的干预过程中,使用里克利和琼斯体能测试组合评估力量和柔韧性,并使用计时起立行走测试评估敏捷性和速度。在干预前后收集数据。为了分析变化情况,我们使用学生t检验和科恩d值来计算效应量(ES),统计学显著性设定为<0.05。此外,应用方差分析来检验时间、组及其交互作用的主要影响,并使用偏 eta 平方来确定这些比较中的效应量(ES)。
感觉运动组在所有测试中均有显著提高(<0.05),而水中有氧组在有支撑和无支撑的站立与坐下(<0.001)、前臂屈曲(=0.005)以及背后伸展(=0.002)方面有所改善。相比之下,对照组和普拉提组在任何评估变量中均未表现出显著改善。对时刻*组交互效应的分析显示,除计时起立行走(TUG)测试外,各组之间存在显著差异。
总之,感觉运动训练和水上训练显著改善了老年人的身体功能,尤其是平衡能力、力量和活动能力。