Suppr超能文献

使用计算机识别术后并发症。

Using computers to identify complications after surgery.

作者信息

Roos L L, Cageorge S M, Austen E, Lohr K N

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1288-95. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1288.

Abstract

We used the Health Services Commission data from Manitoba, Canada to identify complications resulting from hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, and prostatectomy which led to hospital readmissions. For each procedure, two specialists independently judged whether the readmissions were for surgery-related complications on the basis of liberally interpreted literature guidelines. Then, each pair of physicians met to resolve differences; only complications agreed upon by physicians were retained in our computer-based analysis. The analysis was done in three steps: algorithms were developed using guidelines from the literature, physician input, and 1974 hospital claims; these were then modified using 1975 data; finally, the algorithms were tested with 1976 data. The computerized algorithms developed were compared with the clinical decisions of physician panels. The results showed high specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value. Given the increasing availability of routinely collected data bases, the possibilities for inexpensively monitoring the outcomes of different providers and institutions are appealing. More extensive validation and application of the methodology to a greater number of procedures are necessary to implement such a program.

摘要

我们使用了来自加拿大曼尼托巴省卫生服务委员会的数据,以确定子宫切除术、胆囊切除术和前列腺切除术导致再次入院的并发症。对于每一种手术,两名专家根据宽泛解释的文献指南,独立判断再次入院是否是由手术相关并发症引起的。然后,每对医生会面以解决分歧;只有医生们一致认可的并发症才会被纳入我们基于计算机的分析中。分析分三个步骤进行:利用文献指南、医生的意见以及1974年的医院索赔数据开发算法;然后使用1975年的数据对这些算法进行修改;最后,用1976年的数据对算法进行测试。将开发出的计算机化算法与医生小组的临床决策进行比较。结果显示出高特异性、敏感性和预测价值。鉴于常规收集的数据库越来越容易获取,以低成本监测不同医疗服务提供者和机构的治疗结果具有吸引力。要实施这样一个项目,有必要对该方法进行更广泛的验证,并将其应用于更多的手术。

相似文献

1
Using computers to identify complications after surgery.使用计算机识别术后并发症。
Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1288-95. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1288.
4
Assessing data quality: a computerized approach.评估数据质量:一种计算机化方法。
Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90145-7.
10
Are Readmissions After THA Preventable?全髋关节置换术后再入院是否可以预防?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1414-1423. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5156-x. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

2
Detecting adverse events using information technology.利用信息技术检测不良事件。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):115-28. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1074.
8
Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?常规数据:临床审计的一种资源?
Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):104-11. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.104.

本文引用的文献

6
DRGs and the future of surgical practice.疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)与外科手术实践的未来。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Dec 20;311(25):1612-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198412203112505.
7
Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action.应对医疗实践差异:行动建议
Health Aff (Millwood). 1984 Summer;3(2):6-32. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验