Suppr超能文献

使用皮质类固醇进行膝神经阻滞治疗慢性膝关节疼痛:9年实践中的患者报告结局

Genicular nerve block with corticosteroid for chronic knee Pain: Patient-Reported outcomes across 9-years of practice.

作者信息

Chen Mingda, Tosun Sercan, Thompson Nicolas R, Goyal Kush K

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, USA.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2025 May 31;4(2):100601. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100601. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genicular nerve blocks (GNB) for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA) are often performed with an anesthetic only, but corticosteroid can be used as an adjuvant with the goal of extending therapeutic relief. The efficacy of GNB with corticosteroid has been established in small, randomized trials, but its effectiveness in practice remains largely unknown.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the therapeutic effect of GNB with corticosteroid using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a large patient sample.

METHODS

Data from consecutive GNBs with corticosteroid performed at an academic medical center from 2015 to 2024 was collected retrospectively. We included all patients aged ≥18 who received a GNB with corticosteroid for chronic knee pain due to OA, and excluded diagnostic GNBs with anesthetic alone and procedures performed using non-classical/modified techniques. Comparisons between pre-versus post-procedure PROs were by mixed-effect regression models with multiple testing corrections.

RESULTS

A total of 123 GNBs (96 patients) with corticosteroid were identified. Post-procedurally, the mean NRS reductions were 3.56 (2-30 days), 2.14 (1-3 months), 1.92 (3-6 months), and 1.23 (6-12 months). 50 % of the patients maintained a pain reduction greater than or equal to the NRS MCID of -2.0 for at least 6.9 months. Post-procedure improvements in PROMIS-GH and PHQ9 were not clinically significant. Mean time to total knee arthroplasty was 16.5 months in 13.5 % of patients (13/96). For active opioid users, opioid usage was significantly decreased from the baseline 28.01 ± 13.20 MME/day to 13.58 ± 16.23 MME/day (p < 0.002) in the first 6 months post-GNB, and this opioid reduction was maintained at 15.59 ± 12.51 MME/day (p < 0.05) after the initial 6-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

For the majority of patients who received GNB with corticosteroid, we observed statistically and clinically significant pain reduction for 3 months or more in this cohort. While more comparative studies are required to evaluate its effectiveness, GNB with corticosteroid has promising potential as a safe and effective treatment for chronic knee pain.

摘要

背景

膝骨关节炎(OA)继发的膝关节疼痛常仅采用麻醉剂进行膝神经阻滞(GNB),但皮质类固醇可作为辅助药物以延长治疗缓解期。在小型随机试验中已证实皮质类固醇联合GNB的疗效,但其在实际应用中的有效性仍大多未知。

目的

在大量患者样本中,使用患者报告结局(PROs)评估皮质类固醇联合GNB的治疗效果。

方法

回顾性收集2015年至2024年在一家学术医疗中心连续进行的皮质类固醇联合GNB的数据。我们纳入了所有年龄≥18岁、因OA接受皮质类固醇联合GNB治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的患者,并排除仅使用麻醉剂的诊断性GNB以及采用非经典/改良技术进行的操作。术前与术后PROs的比较采用多重检验校正的混合效应回归模型。

结果

共确定了123例皮质类固醇联合GNB(96例患者)。术后,数字评分量表(NRS)平均降低值分别为3.56(2 - 30天)、2.14(1 - 3个月)、1.92(3 - 6个月)和1.23(6 - 12个月)。50%的患者在至少6.9个月内维持疼痛减轻大于或等于NRS最小临床重要差异值-2.0。术后患者报告结果测量信息系统-总体健康(PROMIS-GH)和患者健康问卷9项(PHQ9)的改善在临床上不显著。13.5%的患者(13/96)全膝关节置换的平均时间为16.5个月。对于活跃的阿片类药物使用者,在GNB后的前6个月,阿片类药物使用量从基线的28.01±13.20吗啡毫克当量/天显著降至13.58±16.23吗啡毫克当量/天(p<0.002),在最初6个月的随访期后,阿片类药物使用量维持在15.59±12.51吗啡毫克当量/天(p<0.05)。

结论

对于大多数接受皮质类固醇联合GNB的患者,我们观察到该队列中疼痛在统计学和临床上显著减轻3个月或更长时间。虽然需要更多的比较研究来评估其有效性,但皮质类固醇联合GNB作为慢性膝关节疼痛的一种安全有效的治疗方法具有广阔的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9450/12161999/b5dcdd85ae55/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验