Suppr超能文献

带腓骨支撑植骨的动力髋螺钉(DHS)在治疗股骨颈粉碎性骨折(FNF)时是否更具优势?与新型股骨颈植入系统的对比分析。

Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.

作者信息

Velmurugesan Purnaganapathi Sundaram, Imran Asif, Vasudeva Nagashree, Devendra Agraharam, Dheenadhayalan Jayaramaraju, Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2025 Apr 29;59(6):824-832. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up.

RESULTS

We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups ( < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in surgical time (100 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 23 min), blood loss (370 ± 31 vs. 231 ± 123 ml), and complications (3 [14.2%] vs. 10 [34.4%]) in DHS-FG and FNS groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL CARE

Level I Tertiary trauma centre.

摘要

目的

带腓骨支撑植骨的动力髋螺钉(DHS-FG)是治疗多皮质粉碎性股骨颈骨折(FNF)的一种方法。股骨颈系统(FNS)可提高稳定性并防止FNF患者的股骨颈过度缩短。然而,尚无比较研究来确定哪种方法更具优势。本研究评估了DHS-FG与FNS治疗粉碎性FNF的有效性和并发症。

方法

对2015年1月至2021年3月期间我院收治的50例(年龄18 - 50岁)粉碎性FNF患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为两组:DHS-FG组(21例)和FNS组(29例)。比较参数包括手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间和并发症(骨不连、颈缩短、缺血性坏死)。在末次随访时使用Harris髋关节评分评估患者报告的结果。

结果

我们对所有50例患者进行了24 - 72个月(平均30±2.07个月)的随访。两组在年龄、性别、骨折分类、术后颈干角和尖顶距方面无显著差异。然而,DHS-FG组和FNS组的骨愈合率差异显著(<0.05)。DHS-FG组和FNS组在手术时间(100±9 vs. 76±23分钟)、出血量(370±31 vs. 231±123毫升)和并发症(3例[14.2%] vs. 10例[34.4%])方面也观察到显著差异。

结论

在粉碎性FNF中,DHS-FG的骨愈合率高于FNS,并发症发生率低于FNS。DHS-FG可能是这种骨折类型的一种有效治疗选择,需要进一步研究以探索FNS在这种情况下的潜在益处和局限性。

证据级别

III。

临床护理级别

I级三级创伤中心。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验