• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

点刺试验的标准化:三种方法的比较研究

Standardization of the prick test. A comparative study of three methods.

作者信息

Basomba A, Sastre A, Peláez A, Romar A, Campos A, García-Villalmanzo A

出版信息

Allergy. 1985 Aug;40(6):395-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1985.tb02677.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1985.tb02677.x
PMID:4051141
Abstract

The different needles and methods used in the prick test give rise to disparate results. This has significance when carrying out multi-centre studies and when using the technique in the standardization of allergenic extracts. With test reliability as our objective, prick tests were carried out on 30 subjects: 10 patients sensitive to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus received a glycerine extract of known allergenic potency, 10 healthy individuals 2.5% codeine phosphate in a glycerine solution, and another 10, histamine 1/1000. The total prick tests per individual was 27 with each of the needles employed (Allergy Pricker, the Morrow-Brown needle and Insulin needle in accordance with Pepy's procedure). The tests were carried out systematically by three different testers, and the total number of prick tests performed was 810. With the Allergy Pricker, no differences were observed among results obtained by the same tester, nor when the results of the three testers were compared. With the Morrow-Brown needle, the results varied in the same person and from one tester to another, and on many occasions the test was negative. With the Pepys method, no falsely negative results were obtained, but there was considerable variation in the size of the wheal. The variation coefficient is 41% with the Allergy Pricker, and 115% and 64% with the Morrow-Brown and Pepys method, respectively. In conclusion, the results obtained clearly indicate that the highest degree of reproducibility is obtained with the Allergy Pricker.

摘要

点刺试验中使用的不同针头和方法会产生不同的结果。这在进行多中心研究以及将该技术用于变应原提取物标准化时具有重要意义。以测试可靠性为目标,对30名受试者进行了点刺试验:10名对尘螨过敏的患者接受了已知变应原效力的甘油提取物,10名健康个体接受了甘油溶液中2.5%的磷酸可待因,另外10名接受了1/1000的组胺。每个个体使用每种针头进行的点刺试验总数为27次(按照佩皮斯程序使用变应原点刺针、莫罗-布朗针和胰岛素针)。试验由三名不同的测试人员系统地进行,总共进行的点刺试验次数为810次。使用变应原点刺针时,同一测试人员得到的结果之间以及比较三名测试人员的结果时均未观察到差异。使用莫罗-布朗针时,同一个人的结果以及不同测试人员的结果都有所不同,而且很多情况下测试结果为阴性。使用佩皮斯方法时,未获得假阴性结果,但风团大小存在相当大的差异。变应原点刺针的变异系数为41%,莫罗-布朗针和佩皮斯方法的变异系数分别为115%和64%。总之,所获得的结果清楚地表明,变应原点刺针具有最高程度的可重复性。

相似文献

1
Standardization of the prick test. A comparative study of three methods.点刺试验的标准化:三种方法的比较研究
Allergy. 1985 Aug;40(6):395-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1985.tb02677.x.
2
Reproducibility of skin tests. A comparative study of the Pepys prick test and the Morrow-Brown needle and their correlation with the serum IgE level.
Clin Allergy. 1984 Nov;14(6):581-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1984.tb02246.x.
3
Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the Multitest device.使用多测试设备对可待因、组胺和豚草进行皮肤点刺试验反应。
Ann Allergy. 1990 Sep;65(3):222-6.
4
The allergy pricker. Qualitative aspects of skin prick testing using a precision needle.
Allergy. 1982 Nov;37(8):563-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1982.tb02341.x.
5
Precision of skin prick and puncture tests with nine methods.九种方法进行皮肤点刺和穿刺试验的精确度
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991 Nov;88(5):758-62. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(91)90183-o.
6
Variables affecting interpretation of skin prick test results.影响皮肤点刺试验结果解读的变量。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2017 Mar-Apr;83(2):200-204. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.192956.
7
Allergen skin prick test should be adjusted by the histamine reactivity.变应原皮肤点刺试验应根据组胺反应性进行调整。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;166(1):77-80. doi: 10.1159/000371848. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Comparison of different diagnostic products for skin prick testing.用于皮肤点刺试验的不同诊断产品的比较。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Feb;41(1):23-31.
9
Comparison of three prick test methods with the intradermal test and with the rast in the diagnosis of mite allergy.三种点刺试验方法与皮内试验及放射变应原吸附试验在螨过敏诊断中的比较。
Ann Allergy. 1982 Apr;48(4):235-9.
10
Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.用于皮肤点刺试验的新型采血针与皮下注射针的比较。
Allergy. 1983 Jul;38(5):359-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1983.tb04131.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Food-Related Contact Dermatitis, Contact Urticaria, and Atopy Patch Test with Food.食物相关性接触性皮炎、接触性荨麻疹与食物斑贴试验
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Feb;56(1):19-31. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8687-y.
2
Identification of adults with symptoms suggestive of obstructive airways disease: validation of a postal respiratory questionnaire.识别有阻塞性气道疾病症状的成年人:一份邮政呼吸问卷的验证
BMC Fam Pract. 2003 Apr 25;4:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-4-5.
3
Measuring atopy in a multi-centre epidemiological study.在一项多中心流行病学研究中测量特应性。
Eur J Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;12(2):155-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00145501.
4
Skin tests.皮肤试验。
Clin Rev Allergy. 1988 Summer;6(2):211-27. doi: 10.1007/BF02914939.