Borgbjerg Jens, Breen Bendik Stensby, Kristiansen Cathrine Helgestad, Larsen Nis Elbrønd, Medrud Lise, Mikalone Rasa, Müller Stig, Naujokaite Gintare, Negård Anne, Nielsen Tommy Kjærgård, Salte Ivar Mjåland, Frøkjær Jens Brøndum
Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478 Lorenskog, Norway.
Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jul;7(4):e240250. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240250.
Purpose To assess the agreement between routine-dose (RD) and lower-dose (LD) contrast-enhanced CT scans, with and without Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-based deep learning-based denoising (DLD), in evaluating small renal masses (SRMs) during active surveillance. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, CT scans from patients undergoing active surveillance for an SRM were included. Using a validated simulation technique, LD CT images were generated from the RD images to simulate 75% (LD75) and 90% (LD90) radiation dose reductions. Two additional LD image sets, in which the DLD was applied (LD75-DLD and LD90-DLD), were generated. Between January 2023 and June 2024, nine radiologists from three institutions independently evaluated 350 CT scans across five datasets for tumor size, tumor nearness to the collecting system (TN), and tumor shape irregularity (TSI), and interobserver reproducibility and agreement were assessed using the 95% limits of agreement with the mean (LOAM) and Gwet AC2 coefficient, respectively. Subjective and quantitative image quality assessments were also performed. Results The study sample included 70 patients (mean age, 73.2 years ± 9.2 [SD]; 48 male, 22 female). LD75 CT was found to be in agreement with RD scans for assessing SRM diameter, with a LOAM of ±2.4 mm (95% CI: 2.3, 2.6) for LD75 compared with ±2.2 mm (95% CI: 2.1, 2.4) for RD. However, a 90% dose reduction compromised reproducibility (LOAM ±3.0 mm; 95% CI: 2.8, 3.2). LD90-DLD preserved measurement reproducibility (LOAM ±2.4 mm; 95% CI: 2.3, 2.6). Observer agreement was comparable between TN and TSI assessments across all image sets, with no statistically significant differences identified (all comparisons ≥ .35 for TN and ≥ .02 for TSI; Holm-corrected significance threshold, = .013). Subjective and quantitative image quality assessments confirmed that DLD effectively restored image quality at reduced dose levels: LD75-DLD had the highest overall image quality, significantly lower noise, and improved contrast-to-noise ratio compared with RD ( < .001). Conclusion A 75% reduction in radiation dose is feasible for SRM assessment in active surveillance using CT with a conventional iterative reconstruction technique, whereas applying DLD allows submillisievert dose reduction. CT, Urinary, Kidney, Radiation Safety, Observer Performance, Technology Assessment © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Muglia in this issue.
评估常规剂量(RD)与低剂量(LD)对比增强CT扫描在基于医学数字成像和通信的深度学习去噪(DLD)技术辅助下,对主动监测期间小肾肿块(SRM)进行评估时的一致性。材料与方法:本回顾性研究纳入了因SRM接受主动监测患者的CT扫描数据。采用经过验证的模拟技术,从RD图像生成LD CT图像,以模拟75%(LD75)和90%(LD90)的辐射剂量降低。另外生成了两个应用DLD的LD图像集(LD75-DLD和LD90-DLD)。在2023年1月至2024年6月期间,来自三个机构的九名放射科医生独立评估了五个数据集中的350次CT扫描,以评估肿瘤大小、肿瘤与集合系统的接近程度(TN)和肿瘤形状不规则性(TSI),并分别使用95%一致性界限与均值(LOAM)和Gwet AC2系数评估观察者间的可重复性和一致性。还进行了主观和定量图像质量评估。结果:研究样本包括70名患者(平均年龄73.2岁±9.2[标准差];男性48名,女性22名)。发现LD75 CT在评估SRM直径方面与RD扫描一致,LD75的LOAM为±2.4 mm(95%CI:2.3,2.6),而RD为±2.2 mm(95%CI:2.1,2.4)。然而,90%的剂量降低会损害可重复性(LOAM±3.0 mm;95%CI:2.8,3.2)。LD90-DLD保留了测量可重复性(LOAM±2.4 mm;95%CI:2.3,2.6)。在所有图像集的TN和TSI评估中,观察者间的一致性相当,未发现统计学显著差异(TN的所有比较≥0.35,TSI的所有比较≥0.02;Holm校正显著性阈值,α = 0.013)。主观和定量图像质量评估证实,DLD在降低剂量水平下有效地恢复了图像质量:与RD相比,LD75-DLD具有最高的整体图像质量、显著更低的噪声和更高的对比噪声比(P < 0.001)。结论:使用传统迭代重建技术的CT对主动监测中的SRM进行评估时,降低75%的辐射剂量是可行的,而应用DLD可实现亚毫西弗剂量降低。CT、泌尿系统、肾脏、辐射安全、观察者表现、技术评估 © RSNA,2025 另见本期Muglia的评论。