• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年健康效用指数 Mark 3 评分:基于加拿大健康衡量调查第 5 轮(2016 年和 2017 年)和第 6 轮(2018 年和 2019 年)的人口常模。

Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores for children and youth: Population norms for Canada based on cycles 5 (2016 and 2017) and 6 (2018 and 2019) of the Canadian Health Measures Survey.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Health Rep. 2023 Feb 15;34(2):29-39. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202300200003-eng.

DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202300200003-eng
PMID:36791271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Utility scores are an important tool for evaluating health-related quality of life. Utility score norms have been published for Canadian adults, but no nationally representative utility score norms are available for children and youth.

DATA AND METHODS

Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) data from two recent cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (i.e., 2016 and 2017, and 2018 and 2019) were used to provide utility score norms for children aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Children younger than 14 years answered the HUI3 under the supervision of an adult, while older children answered without supervision. Utility scores were reported as a weighted average (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and median values (interquartile range). Utility scores were stratified by sociodemographic and medical characteristics of the child or adolescent. Regression analyses were used to identify predictors of utility scores. All results were weighted using sampling weights provided by Statistics Canada.

RESULTS

Among the 2,297,136 children aged 6 to 11 years and the 2,329,185 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years in the weighted sample, the average utility scores were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.90), respectively. Approximately 60% of the children and 34% of the adolescents had a utility score of 1.00. Analyses identified several factors associated with utility scores (e.g., age, chronic condition and income levels), although differences were observed between children and adolescents.

INTERPRETATION

This study provides utility score estimates based on a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and youth. Further research examining the determinants of utility scores of children and adolescents is warranted.

摘要

背景

效用评分是评估健康相关生活质量的重要工具。已发布加拿大成年人的效用评分标准,但尚无针对儿童和青少年的全国代表性效用评分标准。

数据和方法

使用来自加拿大健康测量调查(即 2016 年和 2017 年以及 2018 年和 2019 年)的两个最近周期的健康效用指数标记 3(HUI3)数据,为 6 至 11 岁的儿童和 12 至 17 岁的青少年提供效用评分标准。14 岁以下的儿童在成人的监督下回答 HUI3,而年龄较大的儿童则在无人监督的情况下回答问题。效用评分报告为加权平均值(95%置信区间[CI])和中位数(四分位间距)。根据儿童或青少年的社会人口统计学和医疗特征对效用评分进行分层。使用加拿大统计局提供的抽样权重进行回归分析以确定效用评分的预测因素。所有结果均使用加权。

结果

在加权样本中,2297136 名 6 至 11 岁的儿童和 2329185 名 12 至 17 岁的青少年中,平均效用评分为 0.95(95%CI:0.94 至 0.95)和 0.89(95%CI:0.87 至 0.90),分别。大约 60%的儿童和 34%的青少年的效用评分为 1.00。分析确定了与效用评分相关的几个因素(例如年龄、慢性疾病和收入水平),尽管在儿童和青少年之间观察到差异。

解释

本研究提供了基于加拿大儿童和青少年全国代表性样本的效用评分估计。进一步研究儿童和青少年效用评分的决定因素是必要的。

相似文献

1
Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores for children and youth: Population norms for Canada based on cycles 5 (2016 and 2017) and 6 (2018 and 2019) of the Canadian Health Measures Survey.儿童和青少年健康效用指数 Mark 3 评分:基于加拿大健康衡量调查第 5 轮(2016 年和 2017 年)和第 6 轮(2018 年和 2019 年)的人口常模。
Health Rep. 2023 Feb 15;34(2):29-39. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202300200003-eng.
2
Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores for major chronic conditions: Population norms for Canada based on the 2013 and 2014 Canadian Community Health Survey.健康效用指数 Mark 3 评分用于主要慢性病:基于 2013 年和 2014 年加拿大社区健康调查的加拿大人口常模。
Health Rep. 2018 Nov 21;29(11):12-19.
3
Age- and sex-specific Canadian utility norms, based on the 2013-2014 Canadian Community Health Survey.基于 2013-2014 年加拿大社区健康调查的加拿大特定年龄和性别的效用规范。
CMAJ. 2018 Feb 12;190(6):E155-E161. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170317.
4
Health-related quality of life of Canadian children and youth prenatally exposed to alcohol.加拿大产前接触酒精的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 13;4:81. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-81.
5
Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.在一项具有全国代表性的横断面调查中,健康状况影响因基于偏好的健康指数而有很大差异。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Feb;36(2):264-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15599546. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Quality of life of the Canadian population using the VR-12: population norms for health utility values, summary component scores and domain scores.加拿大人口使用 VR-12 评估生活质量:健康效用值、综合评分和领域评分的人口常模。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):453-465. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03536-5. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
7
Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among a Representative Sample of Canadian Children and Adolescents, 3 to 19 Years of Age.3至19岁加拿大儿童和青少年代表性样本中的听力损失患病率
Ear Hear. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):7-20. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000345.
8
Evaluation and measurement of health-related quality of life for individuals with diabetes mellitus by Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) system.采用健康效用指数Mark 3(HUI3)系统对糖尿病患者的健康相关生活质量进行评估和测量。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Nov 14;6:1412-23. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.253.
9
Health-related quality of life in Canadians with asthma: A case-control study using census data.加拿大哮喘患者的健康相关生活质量:使用人口普查数据的病例对照研究。
Respir Med. 2018 Jul;140:82-86. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
Measuring health related quality of life (HRQoL) in community and facility-based care settings with the interRAI assessment instruments: development of a crosswalk to HUI3.使用跨领域评估工具(interRAI)在社区和机构护理环境中测量健康相关生活质量(HRQoL):HUI3 交叉映射的开发。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1295-1309. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1800-0. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A cost-utility analysis of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Canada.加拿大脊髓性肌萎缩症新生儿筛查的成本效益分析。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Aug 13;20(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03927-6.
2
Cost-Utility Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies for Endemic SARS-CoV-2.新冠病毒地方性流行时COVID-19疫苗接种策略的成本效用分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515534. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15534.
3
Comparison of 13-, 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in the paediatric Canadian population: A cost-utility analysis.
13价、15价和20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗在加拿大儿科人群中的比较:一项成本效用分析。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2025 Feb 12;51(2-3):68-83. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v51i23a02. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Best-subset instrumental variable selection method using mixed integer optimization with applications to health-related quality of life and education-wage analyses.使用混合整数优化的最佳子集工具变量选择方法及其在健康相关生活质量和教育-工资分析中的应用。
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 4:rs.3.rs-5550004. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5550004/v1.
5
LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization.具有孟德尔随机化应用的套索型工具变量选择方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):201-223. doi: 10.1177/09622802241281035. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Testing for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma: a Health Technology Assessment.呼出气一氧化氮测定在哮喘诊断和管理中的应用:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024 Jul 31;24(5):1-225. eCollection 2024.