Suppr超能文献

头孢孟多与羧苄西林预防腹部穿透伤后败血症的比较。

Comparison of cefamandole and carbenicillin in preventing sepsis following penetrating abdominal trauma.

作者信息

Lou M A, Thadepalli H, Sims E H, Mandal A K

出版信息

Am Surg. 1985 Oct;51(10):580-6.

PMID:4051334
Abstract

One hundred and five patients with penetrating abdominal injuries were treated with single-antibiotic regimens. Forty-seven patients were treated with intravenous (IV) cefamandole and for comparison 58 patients were treated with IV carbenicillin previously shown to be effective against postoperative infections associated with abdominal trauma. The overall incidence of deep infection on a single antibiotic therapy was 8.6 per cent, including two patients on cefamandole alone (4.3%) and seven (12.1%) on carbenicillin alone. One in each antibiotic group died of sepsis with a total mortality of 1.9 per cent. The authors concluded that cefamandole when used alone was found to be safe and more effective than carbenicillin alone in preventing sepsis in patients with abdominal trauma.

摘要

105例腹部穿透伤患者接受了单一抗生素治疗方案。47例患者接受静脉注射头孢孟多治疗,作为对照,58例患者接受静脉注射羧苄西林治疗,此前已证明羧苄西林对腹部创伤相关的术后感染有效。单一抗生素治疗时深部感染的总发生率为8.6%,其中仅使用头孢孟多的有2例(4.3%),仅使用羧苄西林的有7例(12.1%)。每个抗生素组各有1例死于败血症,总死亡率为1.9%。作者得出结论,在预防腹部创伤患者发生败血症方面,单独使用头孢孟多被发现比单独使用羧苄西林更安全、更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验