Suppr超能文献

穿透性腹部创伤后的感染风险。

Risk of infection after penetrating abdominal trauma.

作者信息

Nichols R L, Smith J W, Klein D B, Trunkey D D, Cooper R H, Adinolfi M F, Mills J

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 25;311(17):1065-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410253111701.

Abstract

To identify the risk factors for the development of postoperative septic complications in patients with intestinal perforation after abdominal trauma, and to compare the efficacies of single-drug and dual-drug prophylactic antibiotic therapy, we studied 145 patients who presented with abdominal trauma and intestinal perforation at two hospitals between July 1979 and June 1982. Logistic-regression analysis showed that a higher risk of infection (P less than 0.05) was associated with increased age, injury to the left colon necessitating colostomy, a larger number of units of blood or blood products administered at surgery, and a larger number of injured organs. The presence of shock on arrival, which was found to increase the risk of infection when this factor was analyzed individually, did not add predictive power. Patients with postoperative sepsis were hospitalized significantly longer than were patients without infection (13.8 vs. 7.7 days, P less than 0.0001). Both treatment regimens--cefoxitin given alone and clindamycin and gentamicin given together--resulted in similar infection rates, drug toxicity, duration of hospitalization, and costs.

摘要

为了确定腹部创伤后肠穿孔患者术后发生感染性并发症的危险因素,并比较单药和联合用药预防性抗生素治疗的疗效,我们研究了1979年7月至1982年6月期间在两家医院就诊的145例腹部创伤并肠穿孔患者。逻辑回归分析显示,感染风险较高(P<0.05)与年龄增加、左半结肠损伤需行结肠造口术、手术中输注较多单位的血液或血液制品以及较多的受伤器官有关。单独分析时发现入院时存在休克会增加感染风险,但该因素并未增加预测能力。术后发生败血症的患者住院时间明显长于未感染患者(13.8天对7.7天,P<0.0001)。两种治疗方案——单独使用头孢西丁以及联合使用克林霉素和庆大霉素——导致的感染率、药物毒性、住院时间和费用相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验