Jones R C, Thal E R, Johnson N A, Gollihar L N
Ann Surg. 1985 May;201(5):576-85. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198505000-00006.
Postoperative infection accounts for significant morbidity and mortality following penetrating abdominal trauma. During a 2 1/2-year period, December 1980 through June 1983, 257 patients sustaining penetrating abdominal injury were initially treated at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas. Following the patient's written consent, they were prospectively randomized to receive, prior to surgery, intravenous clindamycin 600 mg every 6 hours and tobramycin 1.2 mg/kg every 6 hours (CT), or cefamandole 1 gm every 4 hours (M), or cefoxitin 1 gm every 4 hours (C). The antibiotics were continued for 48 hours. Major organ injuries in the three groups were comparable. The overall infection rate was significantly less in the cefoxitin group (13%), compared to cefamandole at 29%, and was comparable to the combination of clindamycin/tobramycin at 20%. The most significant difference followed colon injury. There were 96 patients who sustained colon injuries and the infection rate was CT 33%, M 62%, and C 19% (p = 0.002). If nonoperative wound infections were excluded from the colon group and only severe infections were evaluated, the infection rate was CT 18%, M 38%, and C 13% (p = 0.021). The infection rate was higher in the shock patients and tended to increase as age increased. Enterococcus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most frequent aerobes isolated along with anaerobes. Five of six Bacteroides isolates from major infections occurred in the cefamandole group; two of which were in bacteremic patients. The hospital stay corresponded with infection rates, being 11.4 days (CT), 13.1 days (M), and 9.4 days (C). The results of this study indicate that cefoxitin is comparable to the combination of clindamycin/tobramycin and superior to cefamandole when used before surgery in patients sustaining penetrating abdominal trauma. The study suggests that antibiotic coverage should be against aerobes and anaerobes. Routine administration of an aminoglycoside is unnecessary.
腹部穿透伤术后感染是导致显著发病和死亡的原因。在1980年12月至1983年6月的两年半时间里,257例腹部穿透伤患者最初在达拉斯的帕克兰纪念医院接受治疗。在患者书面同意后,他们被前瞻性随机分组,在手术前接受静脉注射克林霉素600毫克每6小时一次和妥布霉素1.2毫克/千克每6小时一次(CT组),或头孢孟多1克每4小时一次(M组),或头孢西丁1克每4小时一次(C组)。抗生素持续使用48小时。三组的主要器官损伤情况相当。头孢西丁组的总体感染率显著低于头孢孟多组(13%),后者为29%,且与克林霉素/妥布霉素联合组的20%相当。最显著的差异出现在结肠损伤后。有96例患者发生结肠损伤,感染率分别为CT组33%、M组62%和C组19%(p = 0.002)。如果从结肠组中排除非手术伤口感染,仅评估严重感染,感染率为CT组18%、M组38%和C组13%(p = 0.021)。休克患者的感染率更高,且有随年龄增长而升高的趋势。肠球菌、大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌是最常见的需氧菌,同时还有厌氧菌。主要感染中分离出的6株拟杆菌中有5株出现在头孢孟多组;其中2株来自菌血症患者。住院时间与感染率相符,分别为11.4天(CT组)、13.1天(M组)和9.4天(C组)。本研究结果表明,对于腹部穿透伤患者,术前使用头孢西丁与克林霉素/妥布霉素联合相当,且优于头孢孟多。该研究表明抗生素覆盖应针对需氧菌和厌氧菌。常规使用氨基糖苷类药物没有必要。