Suppr超能文献

穿透性腹部创伤后抗生素治疗的评估

Evaluation of antibiotic therapy following penetrating abdominal trauma.

作者信息

Jones R C, Thal E R, Johnson N A, Gollihar L N

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1985 May;201(5):576-85. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198505000-00006.

Abstract

Postoperative infection accounts for significant morbidity and mortality following penetrating abdominal trauma. During a 2 1/2-year period, December 1980 through June 1983, 257 patients sustaining penetrating abdominal injury were initially treated at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas. Following the patient's written consent, they were prospectively randomized to receive, prior to surgery, intravenous clindamycin 600 mg every 6 hours and tobramycin 1.2 mg/kg every 6 hours (CT), or cefamandole 1 gm every 4 hours (M), or cefoxitin 1 gm every 4 hours (C). The antibiotics were continued for 48 hours. Major organ injuries in the three groups were comparable. The overall infection rate was significantly less in the cefoxitin group (13%), compared to cefamandole at 29%, and was comparable to the combination of clindamycin/tobramycin at 20%. The most significant difference followed colon injury. There were 96 patients who sustained colon injuries and the infection rate was CT 33%, M 62%, and C 19% (p = 0.002). If nonoperative wound infections were excluded from the colon group and only severe infections were evaluated, the infection rate was CT 18%, M 38%, and C 13% (p = 0.021). The infection rate was higher in the shock patients and tended to increase as age increased. Enterococcus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the most frequent aerobes isolated along with anaerobes. Five of six Bacteroides isolates from major infections occurred in the cefamandole group; two of which were in bacteremic patients. The hospital stay corresponded with infection rates, being 11.4 days (CT), 13.1 days (M), and 9.4 days (C). The results of this study indicate that cefoxitin is comparable to the combination of clindamycin/tobramycin and superior to cefamandole when used before surgery in patients sustaining penetrating abdominal trauma. The study suggests that antibiotic coverage should be against aerobes and anaerobes. Routine administration of an aminoglycoside is unnecessary.

摘要

腹部穿透伤术后感染是导致显著发病和死亡的原因。在1980年12月至1983年6月的两年半时间里,257例腹部穿透伤患者最初在达拉斯的帕克兰纪念医院接受治疗。在患者书面同意后,他们被前瞻性随机分组,在手术前接受静脉注射克林霉素600毫克每6小时一次和妥布霉素1.2毫克/千克每6小时一次(CT组),或头孢孟多1克每4小时一次(M组),或头孢西丁1克每4小时一次(C组)。抗生素持续使用48小时。三组的主要器官损伤情况相当。头孢西丁组的总体感染率显著低于头孢孟多组(13%),后者为29%,且与克林霉素/妥布霉素联合组的20%相当。最显著的差异出现在结肠损伤后。有96例患者发生结肠损伤,感染率分别为CT组33%、M组62%和C组19%(p = 0.002)。如果从结肠组中排除非手术伤口感染,仅评估严重感染,感染率为CT组18%、M组38%和C组13%(p = 0.021)。休克患者的感染率更高,且有随年龄增长而升高的趋势。肠球菌、大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌是最常见的需氧菌,同时还有厌氧菌。主要感染中分离出的6株拟杆菌中有5株出现在头孢孟多组;其中2株来自菌血症患者。住院时间与感染率相符,分别为11.4天(CT组)、13.1天(M组)和9.4天(C组)。本研究结果表明,对于腹部穿透伤患者,术前使用头孢西丁与克林霉素/妥布霉素联合相当,且优于头孢孟多。该研究表明抗生素覆盖应针对需氧菌和厌氧菌。常规使用氨基糖苷类药物没有必要。

相似文献

6
Single-antibiotic use for penetrating abdominal trauma.用于穿透性腹部创伤的单一抗生素使用。
Arch Surg. 1986 Feb;121(2):153-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400020039003.

引用本文的文献

4
Current management of colon trauma.结肠创伤的当前管理。
World J Surg. 2003 Jun;27(6):632-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6762-9. Epub 2003 May 2.
8
Preventative antibiotics for penetrating abdominal trauma--single agent or combination therapy?
Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:100-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00022.

本文引用的文献

4
Duration of preventive antibiotic administration for penetrating abdominal trauma.
Arch Surg. 1982 Feb;117(2):200-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380260068012.
7
Risk of infection after penetrating abdominal trauma.穿透性腹部创伤后的感染风险。
N Engl J Med. 1984 Oct 25;311(17):1065-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198410253111701.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验