• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知计算模型揭示了序列决策任务中的重复偏差。

Cognitive computational model reveals repetition bias in a sequential decision-making task.

作者信息

Legler Eric, Cuevas Rivera Darío, Schwöbel Sarah, Wagner Ben J, Kiebel Stefan

机构信息

Chair of Cognitive Computational Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Commun Psychol. 2025 Jun 13;3(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00271-0.

DOI:10.1038/s44271-025-00271-0
PMID:40514401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12166051/
Abstract

Humans tend to repeat action sequences that have led to reward. Recent computational models, based on a long-standing psychological theory, suggest that action selection can also be biased by how often an action or sequence of actions was repeated before, independent of rewards. However, empirical support for such a repetition bias effect in value-based decision-making remains limited. In this study, we provide evidence of a repetition bias for action sequences using a sequential decision-making task (N = 70). Through computational modeling of choices, we demonstrate both the learning and influence of a repetition bias on human value-based decisions. Using model comparison, we find that decisions are best explained by the combined influence of goal-directed reward seeking and a tendency to repeat action sequences. Additionally, we observe significant individual differences in the strength of this repetition bias. These findings lay the groundwork for further research on the interaction between goal-directed reward seeking and the repetition of action sequences in human decision making.

摘要

人类倾向于重复那些带来过奖励的动作序列。基于一个长期存在的心理学理论的近期计算模型表明,动作选择也可能受到一个动作或动作序列之前被重复的频率的影响,而与奖励无关。然而,对于基于价值的决策中这种重复偏差效应的实证支持仍然有限。在本研究中,我们使用一个序列决策任务(N = 70)提供了动作序列存在重复偏差的证据。通过对选择进行计算建模,我们证明了重复偏差在人类基于价值的决策中的学习和影响。使用模型比较,我们发现决策最好由目标导向的奖励寻求和重复动作序列的倾向的综合影响来解释。此外,我们观察到这种重复偏差的强度存在显著的个体差异。这些发现为进一步研究人类决策中目标导向的奖励寻求与动作序列重复之间的相互作用奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/03d40dfa62ef/44271_2025_271_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/05e45a5dd7f8/44271_2025_271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/fc896275e7c2/44271_2025_271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/3207c06cd5b1/44271_2025_271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/3b69b92155fd/44271_2025_271_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/3778371db0d6/44271_2025_271_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/b104ecd2994d/44271_2025_271_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/7b57cc1a1976/44271_2025_271_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/03d40dfa62ef/44271_2025_271_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/05e45a5dd7f8/44271_2025_271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/fc896275e7c2/44271_2025_271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/3207c06cd5b1/44271_2025_271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/3b69b92155fd/44271_2025_271_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/3778371db0d6/44271_2025_271_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/b104ecd2994d/44271_2025_271_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/7b57cc1a1976/44271_2025_271_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11c1/12166051/03d40dfa62ef/44271_2025_271_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive computational model reveals repetition bias in a sequential decision-making task.认知计算模型揭示了序列决策任务中的重复偏差。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jun 13;3(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00271-0.
2
Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.主动强化学习与动作偏差和滞后的比较:混合专家与非专家的控制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 29;20(3):e1011950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Interaction between habits as action sequences and goal-directed behavior under time pressure.作为行动序列的习惯与时间压力下目标导向行为之间的相互作用。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 13;16:996957. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.996957. eCollection 2022.
4
Conformist social learning leads to self-organised prevention against adverse bias in risky decision making.从众的社会学习导致了自我组织的预防措施,以避免在风险决策中出现不利偏见。
Elife. 2022 May 10;11:e75308. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75308.
5
Cost-benefit trade-offs in decision-making and learning.决策和学习中的成本效益权衡。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Sep 6;15(9):e1007326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007326. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.适应性历史偏差源于过去选择的置信度加权积累。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2418-2429. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2189-17.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
7
Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans.过去选择的提示会影响人类对奖励的决策。
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 27;8:15958. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15958.
8
Reward and avoidance learning in the context of aversive environments and possible implications for depressive symptoms.在厌恶环境背景下的奖励和回避学习及其对抑郁症状的可能影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Aug;236(8):2437-2449. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05299-9. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Moderate confirmation bias enhances decision-making in groups of reinforcement-learning agents.适度的确认偏差会增强强化学习智能体群体中的决策能力。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 4;20(9):e1012404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012404. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Goal-Directed Decision Making with Spiking Neurons.基于脉冲神经元的目标导向决策
J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 3;36(5):1529-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2854-15.2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Characterizing Human Habits in the Lab.在实验室中刻画人类习惯。
Collabra Psychol. 2024 Feb 28;10(1):92949. doi: 10.1525/collabra.92949.
2
PyMC: a modern, and comprehensive probabilistic programming framework in Python.PyMC:Python 中一个现代且全面的概率编程框架。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Sep 1;9:e1516. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1516. eCollection 2023.
3
Interaction between habits as action sequences and goal-directed behavior under time pressure.作为行动序列的习惯与时间压力下目标导向行为之间的相互作用。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 13;16:996957. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.996957. eCollection 2022.
4
Making habits measurable beyond what they are not: A focus on associative dual-process models.使习惯可测量,超越其本身:关注联想双过程模型。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Nov;142:104869. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104869. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
A goal-directed account of action slips: The reliance on old contingencies.目标导向的行动失误解释:对旧关联的依赖。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Feb;152(2):496-508. doi: 10.1037/xge0001280. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
6
Determining the effects of training duration on the behavioral expression of habitual control in humans: a multilaboratory investigation.确定训练持续时间对人类习惯性控制行为表现的影响:一项多实验室研究。
Learn Mem. 2021 Dec 15;29(1):16-28. doi: 10.1101/lm.053413.121. Print 2022 Jan.
7
lab.js: A free, open, online study builder.lab.js:一个免费的、开放的、在线的研究构建器。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):556-573. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5.
8
Model-Based Planning Deficits in Compulsivity Are Linked to Faulty Neural Representations of Task Structure.基于模型的强迫性计划缺陷与任务结构的神经表示错误有关。
J Neurosci. 2021 Jul 28;41(30):6539-6550. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0031-21.2021. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
Multiple Motor Learning Processes in Humans: Defining Their Neurophysiological Bases.人类的多种运动学习过程:定义其神经生理学基础。
Neuroscientist. 2021 Jun;27(3):246-267. doi: 10.1177/1073858420939552. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
10
Origin of perseveration in the trade-off between reward and complexity.在奖励和复杂性的权衡中坚持的起源。
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104394. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104394. Epub 2020 Jul 14.