Gómez-López J R, Balla A, Licardie E, Morales-Conde S
Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Medina del Campo Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jun 13;29(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03173-9.
Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) in colorectal surgery allows changing the section line (CSL) based on objective evaluation of the vascular supply. The aim of this prospective study is to report our experience with CSL based on ICG-FA during colorectal surgery and to report risk factors influencing it.
From 2014 to 2023, all patients who underwent any colorectal surgical procedure with anastomosis and ICG-FA were enrolled. Patients for whom changing the section line based on ICG-FA was not necessary were included in group A, and patients for whom ICG-FA determined a CSL were included in group B.
Four hundred consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, except for two. In 334 patients (group A, 83.5%), CSL based on ICG-FA did not occur, while CSL occurred in 66 patients (group B, 16.5%). In group B, median time from ICG injection and fluorescence visualization (TIFV) was statistically significantly longer than in group A (28.5 s versus 23 s, p = 0.003). Anastomotic leakage rate was 1.8% and 4.5% in group A and B, respectively, without a statistically significant difference. The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age > 60 years and TIFV ≥ 20 s as independent risk factors for CSL.
Factors influencing the CSL are identified, which could be useful to determine the cases in which this technology should be mandatory and to consider when ICG is not available. These factors could also influence the decision-making process during surgery, such as using protective ileostomy.
结直肠手术中的吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影(ICG-FA)可基于对血管供应的客观评估来改变切除线(CSL)。这项前瞻性研究的目的是报告我们在结直肠手术中基于ICG-FA确定CSL的经验,并报告影响CSL的危险因素。
2014年至2023年,纳入所有接受了任何带有吻合术及ICG-FA的结直肠手术的患者。基于ICG-FA无需改变切除线的患者纳入A组,基于ICG-FA确定了CSL的患者纳入B组。
除2例患者外,400例患者接受了腹腔镜手术。334例患者(A组,83.5%)未发生基于ICG-FA的CSL,而66例患者(B组,16.5%)发生了CSL。在B组中,从注射ICG到荧光显影(TIFV)的中位时间在统计学上显著长于A组(28.5秒对23秒,p = 0.003)。A组和B组的吻合口漏率分别为1.8%和4.5%,无统计学显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析确定年龄>60岁和TIFV≥20秒是CSL的独立危险因素。
确定了影响CSL的因素,这可能有助于确定该技术必须使用的情况以及在没有ICG时的考量。这些因素也可能影响手术中的决策过程,例如是否使用保护性回肠造口术。