Cai Chang, Millett Christopher, Xu Jin, Wang Yanshang, Hone Thomas
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Public Health Research Centre and Comprehensive Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal.
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 13;24(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02541-z.
China's maternal health has substantial inequalities across regions, a similar challenge faced by many low- and middle-income countries. The Chinese government launched a comprehensive health reform since 2015 to deliver more affordable and equitable primary health care (PHC), with pregnant women being a priority group of beneficiaries. However, little is known about the impacts of this PHC reform on primary care utilisation among pregnant women or maternal health inequalities. This study aims to examine whether and how China's PHC reform affected primary care utilisation among pregnant women and maternity deaths differently across regions.
The study employed provincial-level panel data from the China Health Statistic Yearbook and China Statistic Yearbook (2010-2019). Reform implementation by province was identified using web-scrapping of 31 provincial government websites. Firstly, difference-in-differences method examined the reform impacts on visits to PHC facilities, the utilisation of family physician services and prenatal services, and the maternal mortality ratio (MMR). Secondly, fixed-effects panel regression models estimated the association between family physician service use, prenatal care and the MMR. Analyses were stratified by province human development index (HDI) to assess inequalities.
The introduction of China's PHC reform in a province was associated with increased utilisation of family physician services (59.7 per 10,000 people per year, 95% CI 32.8-86.5) and prenatal services (3.2% points per year, 95% CI 1.8-4.6) and reduced maternal death by 9.6 per 100,000 live births per year (95% CI 0.3-19.0) in low-HDI provinces. No reform impact was found in high-HDI provinces. In panel regression models for low-HDI provinces, with a 1.0% point increase in prenatal care utilisation and one increase in family physician visit per 100 people, maternal deaths would decrease by 1.4 (95% CI 0.2-2.5) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-3.5) per 100,000 live births per year, respectively. This association was not found in high-HDI provinces.
China's PHC reforms and primary care utilisation were associated with reduction in MMR in less developed regions, suggesting contributions to lower inequalities in maternal health between regions. Community-level family physician services are likely effective for improving maternal health in high burden areas, but further system and quality improvements are needed in areas where maternal mortality is lower.
中国孕产妇健康在各地区存在显著不平等,这是许多低收入和中等收入国家面临的类似挑战。自2015年以来,中国政府启动了全面的卫生改革,以提供更经济实惠且公平的初级卫生保健(PHC),孕妇是优先受益群体。然而,对于这项初级卫生保健改革对孕妇初级保健利用或孕产妇健康不平等的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨中国的初级卫生保健改革是否以及如何在不同地区对孕妇的初级保健利用和孕产妇死亡产生不同影响。
本研究采用了《中国卫生统计年鉴》和《中国统计年鉴》(2010 - 2019年)的省级面板数据。通过对31个省级政府网站进行网络抓取来确定各省的改革实施情况。首先,采用双重差分法研究改革对初级卫生保健机构就诊、家庭医生服务利用和产前服务以及孕产妇死亡率(MMR)的影响。其次,使用固定效应面板回归模型估计家庭医生服务使用、产前护理与孕产妇死亡率之间的关联。分析按省份人类发展指数(HDI)分层,以评估不平等情况。
在低人类发展指数省份,某省引入中国的初级卫生保健改革与家庭医生服务利用增加(每年每万人59.7人次,95%置信区间32.8 - 86.5)、产前服务利用增加(每年3.2个百分点,95%置信区间1.8 - 4.6)以及孕产妇死亡每年每10万例活产减少9.6例(95%置信区间0.3 - 19.0)相关。在高人类发展指数省份未发现改革影响。在低人类发展指数省份的面板回归模型中,产前护理利用率每增加1.0个百分点以及家庭医生就诊每增加100人1次,孕产妇死亡将分别每年每10万例活产减少1.4例(95%置信区间0.2 - 2.5)和2.4例(95%置信区间1.4 - 3.5)。在高人类发展指数省份未发现这种关联。
中国的初级卫生保健改革和初级保健利用与欠发达地区孕产妇死亡率降低相关,表明对降低地区间孕产妇健康不平等有贡献。社区层面的家庭医生服务可能对改善高负担地区的孕产妇健康有效,但在孕产妇死亡率较低的地区需要进一步改进系统和提高质量。