Cherry Nicola, Beach Jeremy, Galarneau Jean-Michel
Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4, Canada.
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T5J 0N3, Canada.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2025 Jul 15;69(6):626-640. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaf029.
Musculoskeletal disorders are known to result from physical demands at the workplace. Identification of risks specific to particular trades may encourage work modification to prevent new onset conditions.
In a Canadian cohort study of male and female welders and electrical workers, we collected self-reports of low-back pain, shoulder pain, and symptoms suggestive of vibration white finger (VWF) at each 6-monthly contact for up to 5 yr. Physician records of back and shoulder/joint disorders and Raynaud's syndrome were extracted from the Alberta administrative health database (AHDB). At each contact, participants completed questions on ergonomic work factors. We computed cumulative hours exposed for 6 factors: whole-body vibration, hand-arm vibration, manipulating heavy objects, working at or above shoulder height, working while crouching or kneeling, and work in cold environments. The relation of current and log cumulative exposures to health outcomes was identified by proportional hazards regression, adjusting for sex, age, body mass index, smoking, anxiety, and depression.
Of 1,885 workers recruited January 2011 to September 2017, 872 welders and 812 electrical workers recorded symptoms and workplace demands on at least one occasion, with 693 welders and 567 electrical workers matched to the AHDB. In final models, whole-body vibration was related overall to each self-reported health outcome with backpain risk most in evidence for male welders (HR = 1.10 log increase/h of exposure: 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.15, P < 0.001). Working in a crouching position and in cold temperatures also contributed to back pain in welders. Cumulative hours working at or above shoulder height increased welders' risk of shoulder pain (HR = 1.07 log increase/h of exposure: 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.11, P = 0.001). Working at or above shoulder height was related to both back and shoulder pain in the electrical trades, where cumulative exposure to hand-arm vibration was an additional factor for shoulder pain (HR = 1.06 log increase/h of exposure: 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.10, P = 0.007). Manipulating heavy loads was a further risk factor for back and shoulder pain for women in electrical work. There were only 3 incident cases of Raynaud's syndrome in physician records: symptoms suggestive of VWF related strongly to work in cold environments but not to hand-arm vibration. Physician records of back pain did not reflect specific workplace demands, but physician records of shoulder/joint conditions were greater, overall, in those with longer exposure to whole-body vibration and to current hand-arm vibration in electrical workers.
Vibration, a well-recognized hazard, was a risk factor for all outcomes but with whole-body vibration more evidently a risk for welders and hand-arm vibration for electrical workers. The final models of risk factors differed importantly between the two trades, suggesting specific targets for intervention.
已知肌肉骨骼疾病是由工作场所的体力需求导致的。识别特定行业特有的风险可能会促使工作调整以预防新发病况。
在一项针对加拿大男性和女性焊工及电工的队列研究中,我们在长达5年的每6个月一次的接触中收集了关于腰痛、肩痛以及提示振动性白指(VWF)症状的自我报告。从艾伯塔省行政健康数据库(AHDB)中提取了背部和肩部/关节疾病以及雷诺综合征的医生记录。在每次接触时,参与者完成了关于人体工程学工作因素的问题。我们计算了6个因素的累计暴露小时数:全身振动、手臂振动、搬运重物、在肩部或高于肩部高度工作、蹲伏或跪姿工作以及在寒冷环境中工作。通过比例风险回归确定当前和对数累计暴露与健康结果之间的关系,并对性别、年龄、体重指数、吸烟、焦虑和抑郁进行了调整。
在2011年1月至2017年9月招募的1885名工人中,872名焊工和812名电工至少有一次记录了症状和工作场所需求,其中693名焊工和567名电工与AHDB匹配。在最终模型中,全身振动总体上与每种自我报告的健康结果相关,男性焊工的背痛风险最为明显(风险比[HR]=每暴露小时数增加1.10对数:95%置信区间[CI],1.05至1.15,P<0.001)。蹲伏姿势工作和在寒冷温度下工作也导致焊工背痛。在肩部或高于肩部高度工作的累计小时数增加了焊工肩痛的风险(HR=每暴露小时数增加1.07对数:95%CI,1.03至1.11,P=0.001)。在电气行业,在肩部或高于肩部高度工作与背部和肩部疼痛均相关,其中手臂振动的累计暴露是肩痛的另一个因素(HR=每暴露小时数增加1.06对数:95%CI,1.01至1.10,P=0.007)。搬运重物是电气工作中女性背部和肩部疼痛的另一个风险因素。医生记录中仅有3例雷诺综合征病例:提示VWF的症状与在寒冷环境中工作密切相关,但与手臂振动无关。医生记录的背痛并未反映特定的工作场所需求,但总体而言,电工中全身振动和当前手臂振动暴露时间较长者的肩部/关节疾病医生记录更多。
振动是一种公认的危害因素,是所有结果的风险因素,但全身振动对焊工的风险更明显,而手臂振动对电工的风险更明显。两个行业的风险因素最终模型有很大差异,表明了具体的干预目标。