Socias-Soler J, Francisco C, Martínez-García L, Peris-Baquero O, Osma J
University of Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain.
University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jun;34(2):e70025. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70025.
Psychological problems frequently emerge between ages 15 and 24, often coinciding with the university period. In Spain, anxiety and depressive disorders are prevalent among university students, yet only a small fraction receive treatment. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness, acceptability, and implementation of UP in online group format versus a blended format among university students with EDs at the University of Córdoba.
Participants (n = 70) will be randomly assigned to either condition. The study includes pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up assessments at one and 3 months. Primary outcomes are improvements in anxiety, depression, emotional regulation, and distress tolerance. Secondary outcomes include program adherence and acceptability.
Data will be analyzed using SPSS, employing tests for normality, descriptive statistics, t-tests, repeated measures ANOVA, and linear mixed models to evaluate differences and changes over time. Effect sizes will be calculated, and implementation outcomes will be assessed through descriptive analysis. Improvements are expected to be obtained in the assessed outcome variables in all evaluation periods in both intervention conditions and that are maintained over time. No statistically significant differences are expected to be obtained between the two conditions. Participants are expected to report high acceptability and satisfaction scores regarding the intervention, its components, and the intervention format in both conditions. UP-App good usability scores, as well as high acceptability and intention to use in the future are expected to be reported by participants in the UP blended format condition.
This study aims to demonstrate the utility and efficiency of UP in treating EDs in university settings. If effective, these formats could enhance access to mental health services, improve student well-being and support academic success. The findings could inform the development of cost-effective, scalable interventions for university mental health services.
心理问题常在15至24岁之间出现,通常与大学时期重合。在西班牙,焦虑症和抑郁症在大学生中很普遍,但只有一小部分人接受治疗。这项随机对照试验旨在比较科尔多瓦大学患有进食障碍(EDs)的大学生中,线上小组形式与混合形式的UP(未提及具体含义,可能是某种治疗方案或项目)的有效性、可接受性和实施情况。
参与者(n = 70)将被随机分配到两种情况中的一种。该研究包括干预前、干预后以及1个月和3个月的随访评估。主要结果是焦虑、抑郁、情绪调节和痛苦耐受性的改善。次要结果包括项目依从性和可接受性。
将使用SPSS分析数据,采用正态性检验、描述性统计、t检验、重复测量方差分析和线性混合模型来评估差异和随时间的变化。将计算效应量,并通过描述性分析评估实施结果。预计在两种干预情况下的所有评估期内,评估的结果变量都会得到改善,并且会随着时间保持。预计两种情况之间不会获得统计学上的显著差异。预计参与者在两种情况下对干预措施、其组成部分和干预形式的可接受性和满意度得分都很高。预计采用UP混合形式的参与者会报告UP应用程序的良好可用性得分,以及较高的可接受性和未来使用意愿。
本研究旨在证明UP在大学环境中治疗进食障碍的效用和效率。如果有效,这些形式可以增加获得心理健康服务的机会,改善学生的幸福感并支持学业成功。研究结果可为大学心理健康服务开发具有成本效益、可扩展的干预措施提供参考。