Alshahrani Abdullah
Prosthetic Dental Science Department, College Of Dentistry, King Saud University. Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2025 Aug;54:104665. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104665. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
Assessing the effects of various surface conditioners (Air abrasion (AA), Nd: YAG laser, and radachlorin mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) on the average surface roughness (Ra) and push out bond strength (PBS) of glass fiber post (GFP) bonded to root dentin METHODOLOGY: Sixty-four extracted human incisors were obtained from outpatient department and root canal treatment was performed. Post space was prepared, and samples were distributed into 4 groups based on the type of surface conditioning of the post (n = 16). Group 1 (HO + S), Group 2 (AA + S), Group 3 (Nd: YAG laser + S), and Group 4 (Radachlorin mediated PDT + S). Ra (n = 5) and topographic analysis (n = 1) of the post following conditioning were performed using a profilometer and scanning electron microscope. The remaining preconditioned fiber post was bonded to the post space using resin cement (n = 10). A universal testing machine and Stereomicroscope were used for PBS and failure mode assessment. The data were analyzed using the Tukey test and analysis of variance for further comparisons (p = 0.05) RESULTS: Group 2 (AA) pretreated discs showcased the highest average Ra (1023.34 ± 0.033 µm) and maximum PBS (11.92 ± 0.17 MPa, Middle: 11.78 ± 0.10 MPa, Apical: 10.32 ± 0.31 MPa). In contrast, samples from Group 4 (Radachlorin (PDT) + Silane) were found to have the lowest roughness (799.65 ± ± 0.076 µm) and minimum bond strength (Cervical: 8.99 ± 0.43 MPa, Middle: 8.76 ± 0.52 MPa, Apical: 7.22 ± 0.21 MPa) CONCLUSION: Air abrasion and Nd: YAG laser can be used as a suitable substitute for a chemical surface conditioner on GFP as they exhibited comparable Ra and bond integrity of fiber post-conditioned with HO.
评估各种表面处理剂(空气喷砂(AA)、钕钇铝石榴石激光和拉达氯林介导的光动力疗法(PDT))对粘结到牙根牙本质的玻璃纤维桩(GFP)的平均表面粗糙度(Ra)和推出粘结强度(PBS)的影响 方法:从门诊部获取64颗拔除的人类切牙并进行根管治疗。制备桩道,根据桩的表面处理类型将样本分为4组(n = 16)。第1组(HO + S),第2组(AA + S),第3组(钕钇铝石榴石激光+ S),第4组(拉达氯林介导的PDT + S)。使用轮廓仪和扫描电子显微镜对处理后的桩进行Ra(n = 5)和形貌分析(n = 1)。将剩余的预处理纤维桩用树脂粘结剂粘结到桩道中(n = 10)。使用万能试验机和体视显微镜进行PBS和失败模式评估。使用Tukey检验和方差分析对数据进行分析以进行进一步比较(p = 0.05) 结果:第2组(AA)预处理的圆盘显示出最高的平均Ra(1023.34±0.033 µm)和最大的PBS(中部:11.92±0.17 MPa,根尖:10.32±0.31 MPa)。相比之下,第4组(拉达氯林(PDT)+硅烷)的样本粗糙度最低(799.65±0.076 µm)且粘结强度最小(颈部:8.99±0.43 MPa,中部:8.76±0.52 MPa,根尖:7.22±0.21 MPa) 结论:空气喷砂和钕钇铝石榴石激光可作为GFP化学表面处理剂的合适替代品,因为它们表现出与用HO处理的纤维桩相当的Ra和粘结完整性。