Luo Qiwei, Li Jixin, Wang Yurui, Chen Rongjie, Chen Shiyi, Xiang Wenguo
Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, PR China; Shanxi Research Institute for Clean Energy, Tsinghua University, Shanxi, Taiyuan 030000, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, PR China.
Bioresour Technol. 2025 Oct;434:132814. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132814. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
As the global greenhouse effect intensifies, there is an urgent need for green energy to replace traditional fossil fuels in industries like chemicals and energy. This work explores the potential of biomass, a carbon-negative energy source, to reduce the greenhouse effect through sorption-enhanced biomass gasification. The objective of the study is to evaluate the technoeconomic and environmental performance of a biomass-to-hydrogen (BTH) process utilizing a compact fluidized bed gasifier, in comparison with an alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) system. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on the key technical factors influencing the cost of hydrogen production via electrolysis, aiming to identify the critical factors driving the cost difference between electrolysis-based and biomass-based hydrogen production systems. The hydrogen production capacity of the system is 20,000 Nm/hr. The results of the technoeconomic analysis indicate that the BTH system results in lower hydrogen production costs, 2.93 $/kg for zero CO revenue for negative carbon emissions, potentially decreasing to 1.8 $/kg with CO revenue at 60 $/t, compared to AWE's 2.94 $/kg. Moreover, BTH achieves significantly better greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction, with life cycle emissions of 3.25 kg CO/kg H for zero emissions and -17.75 kg CO/kg H for negative emissions, compared with AWE's 1.1 to 4.6 kg CO/kg H. Our research demonstrates the superior potential of BTH systems over PTH systems in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting their promise in advancing hydrogen energy production towards more sustainable and efficient practices.
随着全球温室效应加剧,在化工和能源等行业迫切需要绿色能源来取代传统化石燃料。这项工作探索了生物质这一负碳能源通过吸附增强生物质气化来减少温室效应的潜力。该研究的目的是评估利用紧凑型流化床气化炉的生物质制氢(BTH)工艺与碱性水电解(AWE)系统相比的技术经济和环境性能。对影响电解制氢成本的关键技术因素进行了敏感性分析,旨在确定导致基于电解和基于生物质的制氢系统成本差异的关键因素。该系统的制氢能力为20,000 Nm/hr。技术经济分析结果表明,BTH系统的制氢成本更低,负碳排放零CO收入时为2.93美元/千克,CO收入为60美元/吨时可能降至1.8美元/千克,而AWE为2.94美元/千克。此外,BTH在减少温室气体(GHG)排放方面取得了显著更好的效果,零排放时生命周期排放为3.25千克CO/千克H,负排放时为-17.75千克CO/千克H,而AWE为1.1至4.6千克CO/千克H。我们的研究表明,BTH系统在减少温室气体排放方面比PTH系统具有更大的潜力,突出了它们在推动氢能生产朝着更可持续和高效的方向发展方面的前景。