Wang Zikai, Wei Yifeng, Yu Wilson Shing, Lee Kathy Yuet-Sheung, Tong Michael Chi-Fai, Law Thomas
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR; The Institute of Human Communicative Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR; The Institute of Human Communicative Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
J Voice. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.05.021.
The primary objective of this scoping review is to identify and summarize the factors influencing the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice reported in the existing literature. The secondary objective is to identify the factors affecting the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice that have empirical support.
Scoping review.
Nine online databases were searched, and a backward search was conducted to identify studies that examined the factors affecting rater reliability in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. Our initial online and manual search revealed 2643 studies, of which 101 sources met the eligibility criteria for data extraction.
The scoping review revealed 6 broad factors and 17 subfactors that may influence rater reliability on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. The most studied factor was voice samples (22.0%), followed by vocal parameters and rater characteristics (20.5%), rating scales (15.7%), training (13.4%), and rating tasks (7.9%). Thirty-two studies reported reliability indices and conducted statistical tests for the differences in reliability. Among these factors, the most frequent were training and rating scales (28.6%), voice samples (17.1%), rater characteristics and rating tasks (11.4%), and vocal parameters (2.9%).
The findings of this review allow researchers, clinicians, and educators to understand the various factors that affect the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluations of voice. The results may also guide researchers and educators in developing training programs for less experienced clinicians to improve their reliability in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice.
本范围综述的主要目的是识别并总结现有文献中报道的影响嗓音听觉感知评估可靠性的因素。次要目的是识别具有实证支持的影响嗓音听觉感知评估可靠性的因素。
范围综述。
检索了九个在线数据库,并进行回溯检索以识别研究嗓音听觉感知评估中影响评分者可靠性因素的研究。我们最初的在线和手动检索共找到2643项研究,其中101项符合数据提取的纳入标准。
范围综述揭示了6个宽泛因素和17个子因素,这些因素可能会影响评分者在嗓音听觉感知评估中的可靠性。研究最多的因素是嗓音样本(22.0%),其次是嗓音参数和评分者特征(20.5%)、评分量表(15.7%)、培训(13.4%)和评分任务(7.9%)。32项研究报告了可靠性指标并对可靠性差异进行了统计检验。在这些因素中,最常见的是培训和评分量表(28.6%)、嗓音样本(17.1%)、评分者特征和评分任务(11.4%)以及嗓音参数(2.9%)。
本综述的结果使研究人员、临床医生和教育工作者能够了解影响嗓音听觉感知评估可靠性的各种因素。这些结果还可能指导研究人员和教育工作者为经验不足的临床医生制定培训计划,以提高他们在嗓音听觉感知评估中的可靠性。