Cray Elizabeth, Hayat Nida Javed, Song Chi Ho, Western Max, Edlmann Ellie
Department of Neurosurgery, Southwest Neurosurgery Centre, University Hospital Plymouth, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK.
Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jun 16;48(1):511. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03659-y.
Ground-level falls are the most common cause of Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leading to emergency hospital admissions, in adults aged 65 years and older. The world's population is ageing and frailty is becoming more relevant in healthcare provision, therefore assessment of frailty on admission is integral to care planning. Identifying whether frailty is a risk factor for poor outcomes may facilitate clinical decision making and direct care appropriately. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical frailty assessment or scale in predicting outcomes in older patients following a TBI, including mortality, functional recovery, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition. A systematic review of OVID, EBSCO, Elsevier and Wiley from 2005 to 2025. Included a majority of patients aged 65 years and over, diagnosed with a TBI with a validated frailty assessment tool and at least one outcome measure reported. A total of 12 observational studies (464,606 patients) were included, with a mean age ranging between 70 and 83 years. These studies utilised seven distinct frailty assessment tools. Falls from standing were the most common mechanism of injury identified. Frailty was associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality and unfavourable outcome in combination with a reduced Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission. Frailty was an independent predictor of length of hospital stay, discharge disposition and functional recovery but no study used a validated quality of life tool. Various frailty assessment tools demonstrate effectiveness in predicting clinical outcomes when used in combination with patients age, co-morbidity and neurological evaluation. The predictive value of these tools supports their clinical utility in clinical decision making. Further prospective research is needed to understand how frailty relates to longer term outcomes, particularly quality of life, which was not measured in the included studies. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
在65岁及以上的成年人中,地面跌倒 是导致创伤性脑损伤(TBI)并需紧急住院治疗的最常见原因。全球人口正在老龄化,衰弱在医疗保健服务中变得越来越重要,因此入院时对衰弱进行评估是护理计划的重要组成部分。确定衰弱是否是不良预后的风险因素可能有助于临床决策并合理指导护理。本综述旨在评估临床衰弱评估或量表在预测老年TBI患者预后方面的有效性,包括死亡率、功能恢复、住院时间和出院处置情况。对2005年至2025年期间的OVID、EBSCO、爱思唯尔和威利数据库进行了系统综述。纳入了大多数65岁及以上的患者,这些患者被诊断为TBI,并使用了经过验证的衰弱评估工具,且至少报告了一项预后指标。总共纳入了12项观察性研究(464,606名患者),平均年龄在70至83岁之间。这些研究使用了七种不同的衰弱评估工具。站立时跌倒 是最常见的损伤机制。衰弱与30天和1年死亡率以及入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)降低相关的不良预后有关。衰弱是住院时间、出院处置和功能恢复的独立预测因素,但没有研究使用经过验证的生活质量工具。各种衰弱评估工具在与患者年龄、合并症和神经学评估结合使用时,显示出在预测临床结果方面的有效性。这些工具的预测价值支持了它们在临床决策中的临床实用性。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来了解衰弱与长期预后的关系,特别是生活质量,纳入的研究中未对其进行测量。临床试验编号 不适用。