Cao Yuneng, Zhang Wei, Bai Yaqin, Hao Chengya, He Zhenyan, Cheng Aijun
Department of Rehabilitation, Jining Hospital of TCM, Jining 272000, Shandong Province, China.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2025 Jun 12;45(6):717-722. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240312-k0002. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
To compare the clinical efficacy of needling combined with rehabilitation training and conventional acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training for post-stroke spastic paralysis.
A total of 60 patients with post-stroke spastic paralysis were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 30 cases in each one. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation training. In the observation group, needling was applied at tendon blockage points of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle. In the control group, conventional acupuncture was applied at Jianyu (LI15), Quchi (LI11), Hegu (LI4), Biguan (ST31), Fengshi (GB31), Taichong (LR3), etc. on the affected side. Treatment was given once daily, 5 days a week for 4 weeks in both groups. The scores of clinical spasticity index (CSI), modified Ashworth scale, modified Barthel index (MBI), and Fugl-Meyer assessment scale (FMA) were evaluated before and after treatment, and the onset time was compared between the two groups.
After treatment, the scores of CSI and modified Ashworth scale were decreased compared with those before treatment (<0.001), while the scores of MBI and FMA were increased compared with those before treatment (<0.001) in the two groups. After treatment, the scores of CSI and modified Ashworth scale in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (<0.05), the MBI score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in FMA scores between the two groups (>0.05). The onset time of the observation group was earlier than that in the control group (<0.05).
Both needling combined with rehabilitation training and conventional acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training can effectively treat post-stroke spastic paralysis, needling combined with rehabilitation training exhibits better therapeutic effect and rapider onset.
比较针刺结合康复训练与传统针刺结合康复训练治疗脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪的临床疗效。
将60例脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。两组均接受传统康复训练。观察组在肩部、肘部、腕部、髋部、膝部和踝部的肌腱阻滞点进行针刺。对照组在患侧的肩髃(LI15)、曲池(LI11)、合谷(LI4)、髀关(ST31)、风市(GB31)、太冲(LR3)等穴位进行传统针刺。两组均每日治疗1次,每周5天,共治疗4周。治疗前后评估临床痉挛指数(CSI)、改良Ashworth量表、改良Barthel指数(MBI)和Fugl-Meyer评估量表(FMA)评分,并比较两组的起效时间。
治疗后,两组CSI和改良Ashworth量表评分均较治疗前降低(<0.001),而MBI和FMA评分均较治疗前升高(<0.001)。治疗后,观察组CSI和改良Ashworth量表评分低于对照组(<0.05),观察组MBI评分高于对照组(<0.05)。两组FMA评分比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。观察组起效时间早于对照组(<0.05)。
针刺结合康复训练与传统针刺结合康复训练均能有效治疗脑卒中后痉挛性瘫痪,针刺结合康复训练疗效更佳,起效更快。