Wang Dan, Zhou Zhongliang, Li Mengyao, Wang Wenhua
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 11;11:20552076251349890. doi: 10.1177/20552076251349890. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Digital health technologies are crucial for achieving universal health coverage (UHC), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with limited digital infrastructure. This study aimed to assess digital health capacity across multiple LMICs and evaluate its association with evidence-based practice (EBP) and patient-centered care (PCC).
We analyzed Service Provision Assessment data collected over the past decade, spanning 5311 facilities and 20,880 pediatric visits across eight LMICs. Digital health capacity was measured using the WHO Classification of Digital Health Interventions (CDHI) across five domains: digital infrastructure, client engagement, healthcare providers, data services, and health system managers. EBP was assessed via ten binary items, while PCC was derived from eleven exit interview items using exploratory factor analysis. Multilevel regression models explored relationships between digital health capacity and both EBP and PCC.
Overall digital health capacity was low (mean = 0.35), with notably low scores for digital infrastructure (0.02), healthcare providers (0.21), and health system managers (0.06). Digital health capacity was significantly associated with improved EBP (Coef. = 0.146, p < 0.001), particularly through digital infrastructure (Coef. = 0.183, p = 0.029), client engagement (Coef. = 0.205, p < 0.001), and provider capacity (Coef. = 0.142, p < 0.001). No significant effect emerged for PCC (Coef.=-0.013, p = 0.531).
The level of digital health technology in LMICs is generally insufficient, particularly in terms of digital infrastructure, healthcare provider training and health system managers. Although the implementation of digital health technologies has the potential to improve the EBP, its effect on enhancing PCC is relatively limited.
数字健康技术对于实现全民健康覆盖至关重要,尤其是在数字基础设施有限的低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。本研究旨在评估多个低收入和中等收入国家的数字健康能力,并评估其与循证实践(EBP)和以患者为中心的护理(PCC)之间的关联。
我们分析了过去十年收集的服务提供评估数据,涵盖八个低收入和中等收入国家的5311个设施和20880次儿科就诊。数字健康能力使用世界卫生组织数字健康干预分类(CDHI)在五个领域进行衡量:数字基础设施、客户参与、医疗保健提供者、数据服务和卫生系统管理者。循证实践通过十个二元项目进行评估,而以患者为中心的护理则通过探索性因素分析从十一个出院访谈项目中得出。多层次回归模型探讨了数字健康能力与循证实践和以患者为中心的护理之间的关系。
总体数字健康能力较低(平均值 = 0.35),数字基础设施(0.02)、医疗保健提供者(0.21)和卫生系统管理者(0.06)的得分尤其低。数字健康能力与循证实践的改善显著相关(系数 = 0.146,p < 0.001),特别是通过数字基础设施(系数 = 0.183,p = 0.029)、客户参与(系数 = 0.205,p < 0.001)和提供者能力(系数 = 0.142,p < 0.001)。对于以患者为中心的护理没有显著影响(系数 = -0.013,p = 0.531)。
低收入和中等收入国家的数字健康技术水平普遍不足,特别是在数字基础设施、医疗保健提供者培训和卫生系统管理者方面。尽管数字健康技术的实施有可能改善循证实践,但其对增强以患者为中心的护理的影响相对有限。