Frimpong James A, Shabab Basel Ahmad, Pandey Rohit, Chatterjee Snehamoy, Walton Gabriel, Brand Alexander S
Mining and Minerals Engineering, Virginia Tech, 445 Old Turner St, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA.
Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 630 Dow Environmental Sciences, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931 USA.
Min Metall Explor. 2025;42(3):1305-1323. doi: 10.1007/s42461-025-01257-6. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
This laboratory-scale study presents the development and validation of a hydraulic fracturing technique to directly measure the tensile strength of cemented paste backfill (CPB), providing an alternative to traditional strength testing methods. Fracture initiation pressure (FIP) was used as the primary measure of CPB strength. Experimental results were compared with traditional benchmark measures such as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), and critical Mode-I fracture toughness (K). Regression analysis of experimental results revealed a strong linear relationship between FIP and these benchmark strength measures, indicating that FIP can be used as a reliable predictor of CPB strength. However, traditional linear elastic failure models did not adequately explain the observed FIP values, as they significantly over-predicted the CPB tensile strength. To address this, the Point Stress (PS) model was applied, which provided a more accurate prediction of tensile strength, especially in cases involving small boreholes. The PS model explained observed effects of borehole size on the material's response to hydraulic pressurization. This study confirms that hydraulic fracturing, interpreted through the PS model, is an effective method for determining CPB strength and provides a practical alternative measure to conventional testing methods.
这项实验室规模的研究展示了一种水力压裂技术的开发与验证,该技术用于直接测量胶结膏体充填材料(CPB)的抗拉强度,为传统强度测试方法提供了一种替代方案。破裂起始压力(FIP)被用作CPB强度的主要度量。实验结果与传统基准度量进行了比较,如单轴抗压强度(UCS)、巴西抗拉强度(BTS)和临界I型断裂韧性(K)。实验结果的回归分析表明,FIP与这些基准强度度量之间存在很强的线性关系,这表明FIP可用作CPB强度的可靠预测指标。然而,传统的线弹性失效模型未能充分解释观测到的FIP值,因为它们显著高估了CPB的抗拉强度。为了解决这个问题,应用了点应力(PS)模型,该模型能更准确地预测抗拉强度,特别是在涉及小钻孔的情况下。PS模型解释了观测到的钻孔尺寸对材料水力增压响应的影响。这项研究证实,通过PS模型解释的水力压裂是确定CPB强度的有效方法,并为传统测试方法提供了一种实用的替代度量。