• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区层面社会脆弱性对参保患者可预防的急诊科就诊的影响

Impact of Community-Level Social Vulnerability on Preventable Emergency Department Visits in Insured Patients.

作者信息

Wilder Marcee, Holaday Louisa, Maroko Andrew, Lopez Christopher, Souffront Kimberly, Horowitz Carol, Richardson Lynne D

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 May 30;6(4):100183. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100183. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100183
PMID:40520510
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12166410/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Emergency department (ED) visits that could be managed in primary care settings contribute to inefficiencies and increased health care costs. We examined the relationship between area-level social vulnerability and potentially avoidable ED encounters, controlling for individual factors among insured patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Institute for Health Equity Research Multi-Payer Claims Database, analyzing ED visits from 26,727,123 patients between January 2022 and December 2022. The 3-digit ZIP code Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a composite measure of community risk, was the primary predictor. ED visits were classified as either primary care treatable (PCT) or ED care needed using the Minnesota algorithm. We applied generalized estimating equations to assess the relationship between the SVI and PCT ED visits, adjusting for individual age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Higher SVI scores were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of PCT ED visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.71-1.83), independent of individual factors. Among the SVI themes, housing and transportation showed the strongest association (aOR, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.55-2.81). Black (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.12-1.18) and Hispanic patients (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15-1.19), as well as Medicaid recipients (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.28-1.30), also had greater odds of PCT visits.

CONCLUSION

Area-level social vulnerability, particularly related to housing and transportation, is associated with PCT ED visits. Targeted interventions to enhance primary care access in vulnerable communities may help reduce nonemergent ED utilization and associated costs.

摘要

目的

在初级保健机构可处理的急诊科就诊会导致效率低下并增加医疗成本。我们研究了地区层面的社会脆弱性与潜在可避免的急诊科就诊之间的关系,并控制了参保患者的个体因素。

方法

我们使用健康公平研究所多支付方索赔数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究,分析了2022年1月至2022年12月期间26,727,123名患者的急诊科就诊情况。3位数邮政编码社会脆弱性指数(SVI)是社区风险的综合衡量指标,为主要预测因素。使用明尼苏达算法将急诊科就诊分为初级保健可治疗(PCT)或需要急诊科护理两类。我们应用广义估计方程来评估SVI与PCT急诊科就诊之间的关系,并对个体年龄、性别、种族/民族、保险类型和合并症进行了调整。

结果

较高的SVI分数与PCT急诊科就诊可能性增加显著相关(调整后的优势比[aOR]为1.77;95%置信区间[CI]为1.71 - 1.83),与个体因素无关。在SVI主题中,住房和交通显示出最强的关联(aOR为2.67;95% CI为2.55 - 2.81)。黑人患者(aOR为1.15;95% CI为1.12 - 1.18)和西班牙裔患者(aOR为1.17;95% CI为1.15 - 1.19)以及医疗补助接受者(aOR为1.29;95% CI为1.28 - 1.30)的PCT就诊几率也更高。

结论

地区层面的社会脆弱性,特别是与住房和交通相关的,与PCT急诊科就诊有关。在脆弱社区加强初级保健服务的针对性干预措施可能有助于减少非紧急情况下的急诊科利用及相关成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f55d/12166410/e1caecbb8a07/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f55d/12166410/c2e47b88b069/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f55d/12166410/e1caecbb8a07/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f55d/12166410/c2e47b88b069/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f55d/12166410/e1caecbb8a07/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Community-Level Social Vulnerability on Preventable Emergency Department Visits in Insured Patients.社区层面社会脆弱性对参保患者可预防的急诊科就诊的影响
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 May 30;6(4):100183. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100183. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Patient Sociodemographics and Comorbidities and Birth Hospital Characteristics Associated With Postpartum Emergency Department Care.患者人口统计学特征和合并症以及分娩医院特征与产后急诊科护理相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233927. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3927.
3
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Insurer Classification of Nonemergent Pediatric Emergency Department Visits.种族和民族差异对非紧急儿科急诊就诊者的保险公司分类。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2311752. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11752.
4
Provider-to-provider telemedicine for sepsis is used less frequently in communities with high social vulnerability.在社会脆弱性高的社区中,用于治疗败血症的医疗服务提供者之间的远程医疗使用频率较低。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12861. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12861. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
5
Factors Associated With Avoidable Emergency Department Visits in Broward County, Florida.佛罗里达州布劳沃德县与可避免的急诊科就诊相关的因素。
Cureus. 2021 Jun 11;13(6):e15593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15593. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Race and Ethnicity and Emergency Department Discharge Against Medical Advice.种族和民族与急诊科非医嘱出院。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2345437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45437.
7
Social determinants of health and emergency department visits among older adults with multimorbidity: insight from 2010 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey.患有多种疾病的老年人的健康社会决定因素与急诊科就诊情况:基于2010年至2018年国家健康访谈调查的见解
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18613-8.
8
County-Level Social Vulnerability and Emergency Department Visits for Firearm Injuries - 10 U.S. Jurisdictions, January 1, 2018-December 31, 2021.县级社会脆弱性与因枪支伤害就诊于急诊部-2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日美国 10 个司法管辖区
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jul 8;71(27):873-877. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7127a1.
9
Evaluating the Relationship between Neighborhood-Level Social Vulnerability and Patient Adherence to Ophthalmology Appointments.评估邻里层面社会脆弱性与眼科就诊患者遵医行为之间的关系。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;31(1):11-20. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2023.2180806. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
10
Association of Medicare and Medicaid insurance with increasing primary care-treatable emergency department visits in the United States.美国医疗保险和医疗补助保险与初级保健可治疗的急诊就诊增加之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1135-42. doi: 10.1111/acem.12490.

本文引用的文献

1
Deciphering the Neighborhood Atlas Area Deprivation Index: the consequences of not standardizing.解读邻里地图集区域贫困指数:不进行标准化的后果。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Nov 3;1(5):qxad063. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad063. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Measuring concordance and discordance between selected individual characteristics and corresponding neighborhood-level social determinants of health.衡量选定的个体特征与相应的邻里层面健康社会决定因素之间的一致性和不一致性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 15;8(1):e77. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.517. eCollection 2024.
3
Where Patients Live Matter in Emergency Department Visits in Home Health Care: Rural/Urban Status and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status.
在家庭医疗保健的急诊就诊中,患者的居住地很重要:农村/城市地位和社区社会经济地位。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Jul;43(7):933-944. doi: 10.1177/07334648231216644. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
4
The Neighborhood Atlas Area Deprivation Index For Measuring Socioeconomic Status: An Overemphasis On Home Value.邻里地图区域剥夺指数用于衡量社会经济地位:对房屋价值的过分强调。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 May;42(5):702-709. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01406.
5
Review of the Impact of Housing Quality on Inequalities in Health and Well-Being.住房质量对健康与福祉不平等的影响综述
Annu Rev Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;44:233-254. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071521-111836. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
6
Social vulnerability, medical care access and asthma related emergency department visits and hospitalization: An observational study.社会脆弱性、医疗保健可及性与哮喘相关急诊就诊和住院:一项观察性研究。
Heart Lung. 2022 Sep-Oct;55:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 May 16.
7
State-Level Social Vulnerability Index and Healthcare Access: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.州级社会脆弱性指数与医疗保健可及性:行为风险因素监测系统调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Sep;63(3):403-409. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
8
Systemic And Structural Racism: Definitions, Examples, Health Damages, And Approaches To Dismantling.系统性和结构性种族主义:定义、示例、健康损害以及消除方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):171-178. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01394.
9
The Association of Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Factors with Potentially Preventable Emergency Department Utilization.人口统计学、社会经济学和地理因素与潜在可预防的急诊科利用之间的关联。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 27;22(6):1283-1290. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.5.50233.
10
Social Vulnerability and Premature Cardiovascular Mortality Among US Counties, 2014 to 2018.2014 至 2018 年美国县的社会脆弱性与过早心血管死亡率
Circulation. 2021 Oct 19;144(16):1272-1279. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054516. Epub 2021 Oct 18.