Zhang Yufeng, Li Huili, Xu Songchao, Guo Ruijuan, Ma Danxu, Wang Yun
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95, Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00754-2.
The posterior cervical area exhibits a complex anatomy comprising fascia, nerves, and muscles. With the widespread adoption of ultrasound in regional anesthesia, numerous posterior cervical interfascial plane block techniques have been developed in recent years. The injectate spreads along the fascial plane, blocking nerves that traverse the interfascial space after being injected into the target plane. The posterior cervical interfascial blocks have been manifesting the great potential for perioperative analgesia and chronic pain management in the head, neck, and shoulder regions. However, a comprehensive review of these methods as well as their indications, contraindications, and complications remain lacking. This article summarizes the anatomy of the posterior cervical musculofascial layers, highlighting the characteristics of interfascial plane block techniques and their potential limitations. By using the fascial anatomy as an entry point for studying interfascial plane blocks, it enhances our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the efficacy and complications of these block techniques. It not only reviews well-studied blocks such as trapezius plane (TP), multifidus cervicis plane (MCP), inter-semispinal plane (ISP), and erector spinae plane (ESP) block but also includes recently developed techniques from the past 5 years, such as the retrolaminar cervical block, serratus posterior superior intercostal plane (SPSIP) block, and C2 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) "three-in-one" block. The available evidence suggests that while posterior cervical interfascial plane blocks effectively target the dorsal rami of cervical nerves, non-posterior cervical block techniques also exhibit analgesic potential for the posterior cervical region. This review aims to provide insights for further exploration of novel approaches in this emerging field. In conclusion, posterior cervical interfascial plane blocks demonstrate significant clinical value and warrant further development and optimization.
颈后部区域的解剖结构复杂,包含筋膜、神经和肌肉。随着超声在区域麻醉中的广泛应用,近年来已开发出多种颈后部筋膜间平面阻滞技术。注射剂沿筋膜平面扩散,注入目标平面后阻断穿过筋膜间隙的神经。颈后部筋膜间阻滞在头、颈和肩部区域的围手术期镇痛和慢性疼痛管理方面显示出巨大潜力。然而,目前仍缺乏对这些方法及其适应证、禁忌证和并发症的全面综述。本文总结了颈后部肌筋膜层的解剖结构,重点介绍了筋膜间平面阻滞技术的特点及其潜在局限性。以筋膜解剖为切入点研究筋膜间平面阻滞,有助于我们更好地理解这些阻滞技术的疗效和并发症背后的机制。本文不仅回顾了诸如斜方肌平面(TP)阻滞、颈多裂肌平面(MCP)阻滞、半棘肌间平面(ISP)阻滞和竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞等研究充分的阻滞方法,还纳入了过去5年中最新开发的技术,如椎板后颈阻滞、后上锯肌肋间平面(SPSIP)阻滞和C2背根神经节(DRG)“三合一”阻滞。现有证据表明,虽然颈后部筋膜间平面阻滞能有效靶向颈神经后支,但非颈后部阻滞技术对颈后部区域也具有镇痛潜力。本综述旨在为进一步探索这一新兴领域的新方法提供思路。总之,颈后部筋膜间平面阻滞具有显著的临床价值,值得进一步开发和优化。