• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向医疗保健提供者的ANZAED饮食失调证书:临床医生观点

The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential for health care providers: clinician perspectives.

作者信息

Prnjak Katarina, Conti Janet, McCormack Madalyn, Heruc Gabriella, McLean Siân A, Barns Rebecca, Hay Phillipa

机构信息

Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(Suppl 1):113. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01309-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40337-025-01309-8
PMID:40524249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12172239/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Australia & New Zealand Academy for Eating Disorders (ANZAED) in 2022 established a credentialing system for eating disorder (ED) clinicians that recognises a minimum knowledge, training, and ongoing professional development necessary to provide safe and effective care. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of credentialed clinicians with the new credentialing system, in particular, their view on continuous professional development (CPD) and supervision required for maintaining the credentialed status, as well as how becoming credentialed has affected their clinical work.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-eight credentialed clinicians (92.5% female; 41.7% psychologists; 39.5% dietitians) completed an online survey consisting of multiple choice and open-ended questions regarding their experience with the credentialing system and perceptions of the CPD program.

RESULTS

Credentialed clinicians reported that CPD increased their confidence and willingness to deliver ED treatment, and that supervision enhanced their reflective skills and ethical thinking, whilst 75% of clinicians reported that attaining the Credential had not changed the number of ED patients that they were currently treating on a weekly basis. Content analysis of open-ended questions resulted in three broad themes: professional/personal development; improving care; and acknowledgement and recognition. Differences were found between clinicians working in private practice and those working in public health or both settings with regards to impacts on client referrals to their services.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show that credentialed clinicians perceived a positive experience with the Credential and its ongoing CPD program. However, there may be a need to increase the visibility and external awareness of the credentialing system.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚和新西兰饮食失调学会(ANZAED)于2022年建立了饮食失调(ED)临床医生认证系统,该系统认可提供安全有效护理所需的最低知识、培训和持续专业发展。本研究的目的是探讨获得认证的临床医生对新认证系统的体验,特别是他们对维持认证状态所需的持续专业发展(CPD)和监督的看法,以及获得认证如何影响他们的临床工作。

方法

228名获得认证的临床医生(92.5%为女性;41.7%为心理学家;39.5%为营养师)完成了一项在线调查,该调查包括关于他们在认证系统方面的经验以及对CPD计划看法的多项选择题和开放式问题。

结果

获得认证的临床医生报告称,CPD增强了他们提供ED治疗的信心和意愿,监督提高了他们的反思技能和道德思维,同时75%的临床医生报告称获得认证并未改变他们目前每周治疗的ED患者数量。对开放式问题的内容分析产生了三个广泛的主题:专业/个人发展;改善护理;以及认可与表彰。在私人执业的临床医生与在公共卫生领域工作或在两种环境中工作的临床医生之间,在对客户转诊至其服务的影响方面存在差异。

结论

这些发现表明,获得认证的临床医生对该认证及其持续的CPD计划有积极的体验。然而,可能需要提高认证系统的知名度和外部认知度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a136/12172239/d67ebdfc55c8/40337_2025_1309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a136/12172239/d67ebdfc55c8/40337_2025_1309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a136/12172239/d67ebdfc55c8/40337_2025_1309_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential for health care providers: clinician perspectives.面向医疗保健提供者的ANZAED饮食失调证书:临床医生观点
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(Suppl 1):113. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01309-8.
2
Outcomes of professional development to support capacity to provide eating disorder treatment and exploration of service level barriers.支持提供饮食失调治疗能力的专业发展成果及服务层面障碍探索。
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 18;13(Suppl 1):116. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01308-9.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Patient and Public Perceptions of 3D Technologies (Models and Images) to Facilitate Health Care Consultations: Exploratory, Mixed Methods Study.患者及公众对用于辅助医疗咨询的3D技术(模型和图像)的认知:探索性混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 18;9:e65235. doi: 10.2196/65235.
6
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
7
Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population.父母在新生儿病房接受心理治疗支持的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价,为多元文化人群的干预发展提供信息。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13194. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13194. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
8
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年抑郁症的新一代抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3.
9
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.促进住院儿童睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.
10
Peer researchers in NHS research: approved in principle, undermined in practice?英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)研究中的同行研究者:原则上获批,实践中却受到破坏?
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00708-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of recovery in eating disorders: A focus on different definitions.进食障碍康复的预测因素:关注不同的定义。
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Jun;56(6):1240-1245. doi: 10.1002/eat.23950. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
2
Personalizing eating disorder treatment using idiographic models: An open series trial.使用个性化模型对饮食失调进行个性化治疗:一项开放性系列试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023 Jan;91(1):14-28. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000785.
3
Evaluation of a model of online, facilitated, peer group supervision for dietitians working in eating disorders.
对饮食失调领域营养师在线、辅助性、同伴群体监督模式的评估。
J Eat Disord. 2022 Jul 4;10(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00617-7.
4
Exploring perceived training and professional development needs of Australian dietetic students and practising dietitians in the area of eating disorders: a focus group study.探索澳大利亚饮食学专业学生和执业营养师在饮食失调领域所感知到的培训及专业发展需求:一项焦点小组研究。
J Eat Disord. 2022 Mar 18;10(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00567-0.
5
The legacy of hope summit: a consensus-based initiative and report on eating disorders in the U.S. and recommendations for the path forward.希望峰会的遗产:一项基于共识的倡议及关于美国饮食失调问题的报告与未来前进道路的建议。
J Eat Disord. 2021 Nov 4;9(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00501-w.
6
Understanding training needs in eating disorders of graduating and new graduate dietitians in Australia: an online survey.了解澳大利亚即将毕业和刚毕业的营养师在饮食失调方面的培训需求:一项在线调查。
J Eat Disord. 2021 Feb 18;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00380-1.
7
Credentialing for eating disorder clinicians: a pathway for implementation of clinical practice standards.饮食失调临床医生的资质认证:临床实践标准的实施途径。
J Eat Disord. 2020 Nov 2;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00332-1.
8
ANZAED eating disorder treatment principles and general clinical practice and training standards.澳大利亚和新西兰饮食失调学会治疗原则及一般临床实践与培训标准
J Eat Disord. 2020 Nov 10;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00341-0.
9
An Exploratory Analysis of US Nurse Practitioner Perspectives on Training and Credentialing.美国执业护士对培训和资质认证看法的探索性分析
Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2019;9(3):233-246. doi: 10.1353/nib.2019.0053.
10
Current eating disorder healthcare services - the perspectives and experiences of individuals with eating disorders, their families and health professionals: systematic review and thematic synthesis.当前饮食失调医疗服务——饮食失调患者、其家人及医疗专业人员的观点与经历:系统评价与主题综合分析
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jul 12;5(4):e59. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.48.