Zheng Anqing, Vo Tina T, Muñoz Elizabeth, Wadsworth Sally J, Sliwinski Martin J, Reynolds Chandra A
Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Innov Aging. 2025 Apr 23;9(6):igaf037. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf037. eCollection 2025.
The association between subjective and objective memory in established adulthood and midlife remains understudied, despite its potential importance for early cognitive health interventions. This study examined their convergence in adults aged 28-51, characterizing objective memory through performance level, change, and variability. Furthermore, we explored how sociodemographic and psychological factors moderate the subjective-objective memory convergence, aiming to elucidate the complex interplay between perceived and actual cognitive function in these critical life stages.
Adults in established adulthood and midlife ( = 415, = 35.96, range: 28-51, % female = 59.28%) completed smartphone-based momentary cognitive assessments 3 times a day for up to 14 days. After the conclusion of the assessments, the participants completed a wrap-up survey, including an objective memory measurement. To quantify characteristics of objective memory performance, we used Bayesian mixed-effect location-scale models and modeled intraindividual variability.
Better initial memory performance and improvement over time predicted enhanced subjective memory performance assessments in naturalistic settings, with objective memory change emerging as the strongest predictor. Notably, intraindividual variability in objective memory showed no systematic relationship with subjective evaluations, and psychological and sociodemographic variables did not moderate the objective-subjective memory performance relationship.
These findings highlight the complexity of subjective-objective memory performance relationships in established adulthood. Our results demonstrate the utility of smartphone-based momentary assessments for capturing both longitudinal trajectories and day-to-day variability in cognitive performance. This methodology offers promising opportunities for studying cognitive function in naturalistic settings during established adulthood, potentially contributing to our understanding of early cognitive changes across the lifespan.
尽管主观记忆与客观记忆之间的关联对早期认知健康干预可能具有重要意义,但在成年期和中年期,这方面的研究仍较少。本研究考察了28至51岁成年人中主观记忆与客观记忆的趋同情况,通过表现水平、变化和变异性来表征客观记忆。此外,我们还探讨了社会人口学和心理因素如何调节主观 - 客观记忆的趋同,旨在阐明这些关键生命阶段中感知到的认知功能与实际认知功能之间的复杂相互作用。
成年期和中年期的成年人(n = 415,M = 35.96,范围:28 - 51岁,女性占59.28%)每天通过智能手机进行3次瞬时认知评估,持续14天。评估结束后,参与者完成一份总结性调查,包括客观记忆测量。为了量化客观记忆表现的特征,我们使用贝叶斯混合效应位置 - 尺度模型并对个体内变异性进行建模。
在自然环境中,更好的初始记忆表现和随时间的改善预示着主观记忆表现评估的增强,客观记忆变化是最强的预测因素。值得注意的是,客观记忆的个体内变异性与主观评价没有系统关系,心理和社会人口学变量也没有调节客观 - 主观记忆表现关系。
这些发现凸显了成年期主观 - 客观记忆表现关系的复杂性。我们的结果证明了基于智能手机的瞬时评估在捕捉认知表现的纵向轨迹和日常变异性方面的效用。这种方法为研究成年期自然环境中的认知功能提供了有前景的机会,可能有助于我们理解整个生命周期中的早期认知变化。