Cassidy James, Reynolds Jennifer, Miller Tamryn, Miller Thomas, Brown Jeremy M, Morton Ben, Groom Peter
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1111/anae.16650.
Our aim was to investigate whether emergency front-of-neck airway training utilising low-fidelity manikins in a 'tea-trolley' format could be improved by the incorporation of stress inoculation training. This would be an important advance as clinicians report that cognitive overload impairs performance during real emergencies. We hypothesised that environmental noise and simulated blood splatter would result in a heightened stress experience.
Thirteen anaesthetic residents completed the study, performing emergency front-of-neck access first under non-stressed conditions and later with the addition of noise and startle stressors. The primary outcome was a change in salivary cortisol, measured before and after each training session. Secondary outcomes included participant proficiency; time to perform the procedure; and perceived stress and utility of the training. Semi-structured interviews explored participant perceptions of the training.
Environmental noise and simulated blood splatter resulted in a quantitatively and qualitatively heightened stressful experience for the participants in paired comparisons. There was no significant change in median (IQR [range]) salivary cortisol levels after participants completed the non-stressed training: 6.4 (4.3-8.1 [3.3-16.2]) nmol.l vs. 9.2 (5.8-11.3 [3.8-14.1]) nmol.l, respectively (p = 0.133). There were, however, significant changes following stressed training: 4.9 (4.3-11.6 [1.1-11.6]) mol.l vs. 9.2 (8.0-12.1 [4.4-20.1]) nmol.l, respectively (p = 0.005). Participants' semi-structured interviews and questionnaire results evidenced that the adaptations created a more stressful yet valuable training experience.
Environmental noise and simulated blood splatter increased participant stress. Participants performed emergency front-of-neck access equally well in both sessions, suggesting this technical skill is stored in their stress-resistant long-term memory. These relatively low-cost adaptations could enhance emergency front-of-neck airway tea-trolley training by facilitating stress inoculation training and so better prepare clinicians for real-world emergencies.
We wanted to find out if we could make emergency training better for doctors. This training helps them learn how to quickly make a hole in the neck to help someone breathe if other ways don't work. Right now, doctors practice on simple plastic models during quick training sessions, like ones you might find on a tea trolley. But in real emergencies, doctors can get very stressed, which can make it harder to think clearly. So, we wondered if adding things like loud noise and fake blood to the training would help doctors get used to working under pressure. Thirteen doctors who are learning to give anaesthetics took part in the study. First, they did the training in a quiet, calm setting. Then, they did the same training again, but this time with loud noises and surprises, like fake blood splashing. We measured how stressed they felt by testing their spit for a stress chemical called cortisol, both before and after the training. We also looked at how well and how fast they did the job, and asked them how they felt about the training. The loud noises and fake blood made the doctors feel more stressed, both from the test results and from what they told us. When the training was calm, their stress levels didn’t change much. But with noise and fake blood, their stress levels went up a lot. Even though they were more stressed, they still did the job just as well. The doctors said the training felt more real and useful when it included the stress. Adding noise and fake blood made the doctors feel more pressure, like in real emergencies. This kind of training doesn't cost much more but could help doctors be more prepared when it really counts.
我们的目的是研究在“茶车”模式下使用低保真人体模型进行紧急颈部前方气道训练时,是否可以通过纳入应激接种训练来加以改进。这将是一项重要的进展,因为临床医生报告称,在实际紧急情况下,认知过载会损害操作表现。我们假设环境噪音和模拟血液飞溅会导致压力体验增强。
13名麻醉住院医师完成了该研究,他们首先在无压力条件下进行紧急颈部前方气道操作,随后增加噪音和惊吓应激源后再次进行操作。主要结果是每次训练前后测量的唾液皮质醇变化。次要结果包括参与者的熟练程度;完成操作的时间;以及对训练的感知压力和实用性。半结构化访谈探讨了参与者对训练的看法。
在配对比较中,环境噪音和模拟血液飞溅使参与者在压力体验的数量和质量上都有所增强。参与者完成无压力训练后,唾液皮质醇水平中位数(四分位间距[范围])无显著变化:分别为6.4(4.3 - 8.1[3.3 - 16.2])nmol/l和9.2(5.8 - 11.3[3.8 - 14.1])nmol/l(p = 0.133)。然而,在有压力训练后有显著变化:分别为4.9(4.3 - 11.6[1.1 - 11.6])nmol/l和9.2(8.0 - 12.1[4.4 - 20.1])nmol/l(p = 0.005)。参与者的半结构化访谈和问卷调查结果表明,这些调整创造了一种压力更大但更有价值的训练体验。
环境噪音和模拟血液飞溅增加了参与者的压力。参与者在两个阶段进行紧急颈部前方气道操作的表现同样出色,这表明这项技术技能存储在他们抗压力的长期记忆中。这些成本相对较低的调整可以通过促进应激接种训练来增强紧急颈部前方气道茶车训练,从而更好地让临床医生为实际紧急情况做好准备。
我们想弄清楚是否能让医生的紧急培训变得更好。这种培训帮助他们学习在其他方法无效时如何快速在颈部打孔以帮助某人呼吸。目前,医生在快速训练课程中在简单塑料模型上练习,就像在茶车上能找到的那种。但在实际紧急情况下,医生会非常紧张,这会使他们更难清晰思考。所以,我们想知道在训练中加入诸如噪音和假血之类的东西是否能帮助医生习惯在压力下工作。13名正在学习麻醉的医生参与了这项研究。首先,他们在安静、平静的环境中进行训练。然后,他们再次进行相同的训练,但这次有噪音和惊吓,比如假血飞溅。我们通过检测他们的唾液中一种叫做皮质醇 的应激化学物质来测量他们感到的压力程度,在训练前后都进行了检测。我们还观察了他们工作的好坏和速度,并询问他们对训练的感受。噪音和假血使医生感到压力更大,这从测试结果以及他们告诉我们的情况都能看出来。当训练平静时,他们的压力水平变化不大。但有噪音和假血时,他们的压力水平大幅上升。尽管他们压力更大,但他们工作表现仍然一样好。医生们说当训练包含压力时,感觉更真实且有用。加入噪音和假血使医生感到更多压力,就像在实际紧急情况中一样。这种训练成本增加不多,但能帮助医生在关键时刻更有准备。