• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童及青少年精神状态检查表(CAPE)调查版的短期稳定性

The short-term stability of the survey version of CAPE.

作者信息

McPherson F M, Tregaskis D

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 1985 Sep;24 ( Pt 3):205-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01335.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01335.x
PMID:4052667
Abstract

One hundred elderly women were assessed on two occasions, one week apart, on the survey version of CAPE. Although test-retest correlations were high, the dependency grades of 35 per cent of the sample changed on retesting by one grade, and 2 per cent by two grades, suggesting that the test may be too unstable for clinical purposes.

摘要

100名老年女性在相隔一周的两个时间点接受了社区老年评估问卷(CAPE)调查版的评估。尽管重测信度很高,但35%的样本在重新测试时依赖等级改变了一级,2%改变了两级,这表明该测试用于临床目的时可能过于不稳定。

相似文献

1
The short-term stability of the survey version of CAPE.儿童及青少年精神状态检查表(CAPE)调查版的短期稳定性
Br J Clin Psychol. 1985 Sep;24 ( Pt 3):205-6. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01335.x.
2
The concurrent validity of the survey version of the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly (CAPE).老年人克利夫顿评估程序(CAPE)调查版本的同时效度。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1985 May;24 ( Pt 2):83-91. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01318.x.
3
Dependency rating scales: for use in psychogeriatric nursing.依赖评定量表:用于老年精神科护理。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1980 Jan;38(1):36-41.
4
Reliability of a Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination.标准化简易精神状态检查表与传统简易精神状态检查表的可靠性比较
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;148(1):102-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.1.102.
5
Test-retest reliability of the Xhosa version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.科萨语版儿童诊断访谈量表的重测信度。
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Mar;38(2):261-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01195.x. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
6
Construct validity of the Rorschach Oral Dependency (ROD) Scale: relationship of ROD scores to WAIS-R scores in a psychiatric inpatient sample.
J Clin Psychol. 1997 Feb;53(2):99-105. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199702)53:2<99::aid-jclp2>3.0.co;2-p.
7
Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale with undergraduate nursing trainees.华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表中文版在本科护理实习生中的翻译与验证
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;23(9-10):554-560. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12344.
8
Profile stability of a clinical rating scale.
Psychol Rep. 1974 Jun;34(3):915-26. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1974.34.3.915.
9
[Reliability of the Brazilian version of the clinical interview schedule].[巴西版临床访谈时间表的可靠性]
Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1986 Jan;100(1):77-83.
10
Sex differences in dependency: a comparison of objective and projective measures.依赖方面的性别差异:客观测量与投射测量的比较。
J Pers Assess. 1993 Aug;61(1):169-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6101_13.