Suppr超能文献

依赖方面的性别差异:客观测量与投射测量的比较。

Sex differences in dependency: a comparison of objective and projective measures.

作者信息

Bornstein R F, Manning K A, Krukonis A B, Rossner S C, Mastrosimone C C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Gettysburg College, PA 17325.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1993 Aug;61(1):169-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6101_13.

Abstract

The relationship between scores on two widely used measures of dependency--one objective and one projective--was examined in a sample of 102 undergraduate subjects (60 women and 42 men). Consistent with previous studies in this area, significant sex differences were found on the objective measure of dependency, with women obtaining higher dependency scores than men. However, as predicted, men and women obtained comparable scores on the projective measure of dependency. Additional analyses confirmed that scores on the objective and projective measures of dependency were significantly intercorrelated in both men and women, although the magnitudes of these correlations were somewhat larger in women than in men. Implications of these results for the assessment of dependent personality traits in research and clinical settings are discussed.

摘要

在102名本科受试者(60名女性和42名男性)的样本中,研究了两种广泛使用的依赖度量表——一种是客观量表,一种是投射量表——得分之间的关系。与该领域之前的研究一致,在依赖的客观量表上发现了显著的性别差异,女性的依赖得分高于男性。然而,正如预测的那样,男性和女性在依赖的投射量表上获得了相当的分数。进一步的分析证实,在依赖的客观量表和投射量表上的得分在男性和女性中都显著相互关联,尽管这些相关性的程度在女性中比在男性中略大。讨论了这些结果对研究和临床环境中依赖人格特质评估的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验