• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康的康复:一项从以康复为导向的专业视角开展的国际德尔菲研究。

Recovery in mental health: An international Delphi study from a recovery-oriented professional perspective.

作者信息

Guerrero Estefania, Barrios Maite, Sampietro Hernán María, Aza Alba, Guilera Georgina, Gómez-Benito Juana

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain; ActivaMent Catalunya Associació, Spain.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2025 Sep;381:118302. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118302. Epub 2025 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118302
PMID:40527100
Abstract

Current public policies emphasize the need for recovery-oriented services. However, a lack of consensus on the meaning of recovery poses challenges for implementing recovery-oriented interventions. This study aims to establish an international consensus on the key elements of recovery from the clinician perspective, specifically from recovery-oriented mental health professionals. A three-round Delphi study was conducted to gather expert opinions on the definition of recovery, progress indicators, and factors that facilitate and hinder recovery. Seventy-eight recovery-oriented professionals agreed to participate and completed a sociodemographic questionnaire after providing informed consent. In the first Delphi round, open-ended questions were used to gather initial opinions, which were analyzed and compiled into a list of statements. In the second and third rounds, participants rated the relevance of each statement using a Likert-type scale. Statements rated as "relevant" or "very relevant" by at least 80 % of participants were considered consensus statements. Recovery was defined as the development of a sense of agency, empowerment, autonomy, and self-determination. Key indicators emphasized agency, empowerment, user safety, and informed decision-making. Facilitators included the promotion of self-determination, a holistic approach within services, and the integration of peer support. Social exclusion emerged as the most significant obstacle to recovery. This study provides an international consensus on the key elements of recovery in mental health from the perspective of recovery-oriented professionals, offering insights for implementing interventions, developing recovery-oriented services, and refining measurement instruments.

摘要

当前的公共政策强调需要提供以康复为导向的服务。然而,对于康复的含义缺乏共识给实施以康复为导向的干预措施带来了挑战。本研究旨在从临床医生的角度,特别是从以康复为导向的心理健康专业人员的角度,就康复的关键要素达成国际共识。开展了三轮德尔菲研究,以收集关于康复定义、进展指标以及促进和阻碍康复的因素的专家意见。78名以康复为导向的专业人员在提供知情同意后同意参与并完成了一份社会人口统计学调查问卷。在第一轮德尔菲研究中,使用开放式问题收集初步意见,这些意见经过分析后汇编成一份陈述清单。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者使用李克特量表对每条陈述的相关性进行评分。至少80%的参与者评为“相关”或“非常相关”的陈述被视为共识陈述。康复被定义为产生一种能动性、赋权、自主性和自我决定权。关键指标强调能动性、赋权、服务对象安全和知情决策。促进因素包括促进自我决定权、服务中的整体方法以及同伴支持的整合。社会排斥成为康复最显著的障碍。本研究从以康复为导向的专业人员的角度就心理健康康复的关键要素达成了国际共识,为实施干预措施、发展以康复为导向的服务以及完善测量工具提供了见解。

相似文献

1
Recovery in mental health: An international Delphi study from a recovery-oriented professional perspective.心理健康的康复:一项从以康复为导向的专业视角开展的国际德尔菲研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Sep;381:118302. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118302. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Developing and Tailoring a Person-Centred Pathway for Mental Health Care for People Receiving Dialysis.为接受透析治疗的患者制定并量身定制以患者为中心的心理健康护理路径。
Nephron. 2025;149(7):392-410. doi: 10.1159/000544058. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Hail Lifestyle Medicine consensus position statement as a medical specialty: Middle Eastern perspective.欢呼将生活方式医学作为一门医学专业的共识立场声明:中东视角。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;13:1455871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1455871. eCollection 2025.
5
The experience of healthcare professionals implementing recovery-oriented practice in mental health inpatient units: A qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健专业人员在精神科住院病房实施以康复为导向的实践的经验:定性证据综合。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):287-302. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12985. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
6
Standardizing the Definition of Each Colon Cancer Segment: Delphi Consensus on Clinical Decision-Making for Oncologic Outcomes.规范各结肠癌节段的定义:关于肿瘤学结局临床决策的德尔菲共识
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003739.
7
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
8
Interventions for cognitive frailty: developing a Delphi consensus with multidisciplinary and multisectoral experts.认知衰弱的干预措施:与多学科和多部门专家达成德尔菲共识。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jun 4;17:1541048. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1541048. eCollection 2025.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Identifying social outcomes of importance for childhood cancer survivors: an e-Delphi study.确定对儿童癌症幸存者重要的社会结果:一项电子德尔菲研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Feb 5;8(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00676-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Support for Recovery in Mental Health: A Delphi Study From the Family's Perspective.心理健康康复支持:基于家庭视角的德尔菲研究
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(4):e70119. doi: 10.1111/inm.70119.