Kakar Saakshi, Foye Una, Davies Helena L, Palaiologou Elisavet, Malouf Chelsea M, Meldrum Laura, Smith Iona, Kalsi Gursharan, Allen Karina L, Breen Gerome, Herle Moritz, Hübel Christopher
Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, UK.
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Sep;58(9):1806-1816. doi: 10.1002/eat.24477. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
This study aimed to explore the diverse range of weight loss behaviors that extend beyond traditional diagnostic criteria, highlighting the variability in symptom presentation.
We text mined free-text responses from 1675 participants with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge-eating disorder in the Genetic Links to Anxiety and Depression (GLAD) Study and the Eating Disorders Genetics Initiative UK (EDGI UK). In secondary analyses, we investigated differences by eating disorder and gender.
Frequently endorsed behaviors included structured diets (619 endorsements) and calorie counting (422 endorsements), but also less commonly considered behaviors like compression garments (147 endorsements) and self-harm (88 endorsements). We identified four overarching themes: restriction-based approaches, medical intervention, body manipulation, and food avoidance. The most frequently reported weight loss behaviors and resultant themes did not differ among eating disorders or genders, closely resembling those in the broader sample. Notably, 81 participants with binge-eating disorder, which typically lacks the endorsement of recurrent compensatory behaviors, reported weight loss and compensatory behaviors.
Our findings identify a crucial gap in current diagnostic assessments, which may hamper recognition and lead to underdiagnosis of eating disorders. By incorporating our insights into an inclusive assessment process that expects and accommodates novel behaviors, clinicians could capture a broader spectrum of behaviors, thus improving diagnostic accuracy. However, our sample homogeneity implies the need for more diverse samples. Our study contributes essential insights for enhancing diagnostic criteria.
本研究旨在探索超出传统诊断标准的各种减肥行为,突出症状表现的变异性。
我们对来自“焦虑与抑郁的遗传联系”(GLAD)研究以及英国饮食失调遗传学倡议(EDGI UK)中1675名患有神经性厌食症、神经性贪食症或暴饮暴食症的参与者的自由文本回复进行了文本挖掘。在二次分析中,我们按饮食失调类型和性别调查了差异。
经常被认可的行为包括结构化饮食(619次认可)和计算卡路里(422次认可),但也有一些较少被考虑的行为,如紧身衣(147次认可)和自我伤害(88次认可)。我们确定了四个总体主题:基于限制的方法、医学干预、身体操控和食物回避。报告最多的减肥行为及由此产生的主题在不同饮食失调类型或性别之间并无差异,与更广泛样本中的情况极为相似。值得注意的是,81名患有暴饮暴食症的参与者(该病症通常不伴有反复出现的代偿行为)报告了减肥和代偿行为。
我们的研究结果揭示了当前诊断评估中的一个关键差距,这可能会妨碍对饮食失调的识别并导致诊断不足。通过将我们的见解纳入一个包容新行为的评估过程中,临床医生能够捕捉到更广泛的行为,从而提高诊断准确性。然而,我们样本的同质性意味着需要更多样化的样本。我们的研究为完善诊断标准提供了重要见解。