Kolk H H, Blomert L
Brain Lang. 1985 Sep;26(1):94-105. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(85)90030-6.
In 1980, D. C. Bradley, M. F. Garrett, and E. B. Zurif (in D. Caplan (Ed.), Biological studies of mental processes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) have proposed a lexical hypothesis on agrammatism. The theoretical background of this hypothesis is described. Then two experiments are reported with normal speakers on the so-called nonword-interference effect that has been one of the two major sources of experimental evidence for this hypothesis. The first experiment replicates the original finding that the interference effect is found when the nonword starts with a content word but not when it starts with a function word. In the second experiment, it is shown that this contrast is due to an artifact of the composition of the word list. When this list contains both content and function words, rather than only content words--as in Bradley's experiments and our Experiment I--both content and function nonwords show an equally sized interference effect. The consequences for the lexical hypothesis are discussed.
1980年,D.C.布拉德利、M.F.加勒特和E.B.祖里夫(载于D.卡普兰编著的《心理过程的生物学研究》,马萨诸塞州剑桥:麻省理工学院出版社)提出了关于语法缺失的词汇假说。阐述了这一假说的理论背景。随后报告了两项针对正常说话者的实验,实验对象是所谓的非词干扰效应,该效应一直是这一假说的两大主要实验证据来源之一。第一个实验重复了最初的发现,即当非词以实义词开头时会发现干扰效应,而当以功能词开头时则不会。在第二个实验中,结果表明这种对比是由于单词列表构成的人为因素造成的。当这个列表既包含实义词又包含功能词时,而不是像布拉德利的实验和我们的实验一中那样只包含实义词时,实义非词和功能非词都会呈现出同样大小的干扰效应。讨论了这一结果对词汇假说的影响。