Gordon B, Caramazza A
Brain Lang. 1983 Jul;19(2):335-45. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(83)90075-5.
Bradley, Garrett, and Zurif (Bradley, Computational distinctions of vocabulary type. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT Press; Cambridge, MA, 1978; Biological studies of mental processes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980) have suggested that closed-class word access is normally mediated by a different route than the open-class one, and that the loss of this closed-class route might account for agrammatism. However, in an earlier study (Gordon & Caramazza, Brain and Language, 15, 143-160, 1982) we were not able to confirm a meaningful difference between closed- and open-class word frequency responsiveness of the type Bradley (unpublished dissertation, 1978) had seemed to find in normal subjects. We have now done a direct comparison of closed-class frequency sensitivity in agrammatic and nonagrammatic aphasics, to directly test Bradley and colleagues' hypotheses and to avoid some of the experimental problems with between-class frequency comparisons. We find that closed-class words behave similarly whether or not the subject is agrammatic. Therefore, the differences between agrammatic and nonagrammatic aphasics must arise at a deeper level (or levels) of lexical processing than the one probed by the frequency sensitivity effect.
布拉德利、加勒特和祖里夫(布拉德利,《词汇类型的计算差异》。未发表的博士论文,麻省理工学院出版社;马萨诸塞州剑桥,1978年;《心理过程的生物学研究》,麻省理工学院出版社,马萨诸塞州剑桥,1980年)提出,封闭类词的通达通常由一条与开放类词不同的途径介导,并且这条封闭类途径的丧失可能是语法缺失的原因。然而,在早期的一项研究中(戈登和卡拉马扎,《大脑与语言》,第15卷,第143 - 160页,1982年),我们无法证实布拉德利(未发表的论文,1978年)似乎在正常受试者中发现的封闭类词和开放类词频率反应性之间存在有意义的差异。我们现在对语法缺失性失语症患者和非语法缺失性失语症患者的封闭类频率敏感性进行了直接比较,以直接检验布拉德利及其同事的假设,并避免类间频率比较中的一些实验问题。我们发现,无论受试者是否患有语法缺失症,封闭类词的表现都相似。因此,语法缺失性失语症患者和非语法缺失性失语症患者之间的差异必定出现在词汇加工比频率敏感性效应所探究的更深层次上。