Kin Kyohei, Kusumegi Akira, Chinen Masashi, Okamoto Shohei, Mitsuhashi Toshiharu, Takahashi Yuichi, Nishida Kenki
Department of Neurological Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Spinal Surgery, Shinkomonji Hospital, Kitakyusyu, Japan.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09066-7.
Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is a prevalent degenerative musculoskeletal disorder in aging populations. While decompression surgery is a standard treatment, some patients require revision surgery. Disc bulging, a distinct component of the degenerative process separate from disc herniation, contributes to spinal stenosis. However, its impact on surgical outcomes for LSCS has never been examined. This study aimed to elucidate the influence of disc bulging on outcomes of decompressive surgery for LSCS, addressing a critical knowledge gap.
This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 517 consecutive patients involving 912 intervertebral levels who underwent decompression surgery for LSCS. We statistically evaluated the association between disc bulging and revision surgery. Two measures were utilized to assess disc bulging: the extended area of the disc (EAD), referring to the horizontal expansion of the disc, and the disc bulging length (DBL), which indicated the degree of disc intrusion into the spinal canal. Other conventional radiographical assessments and patient background characteristics were also evaluated.
Revision surgery was required in 28 patients (5.4%) involving 31 intervertebral levels (3.4%). Patients requiring revision surgery were significantly younger and more likely to smoke. Both the EAD and DBL were significantly higher in the revision group compared to the no-revision group (P <.001 for both). We did not observe an association between other conventional radiographical assessments and revision surgery. Multivariable analysis revealed that the EAD and DBL were independently correlated with revision surgery.
This study demonstrated that disc bulging, particularly as measured by EAD, is a significant predictor of revision surgery following decompression for LSCS. These findings highlight the importance of pre-operative assessment of disc bulging in predicting surgical outcomes and optimizing patient selection for decompressive procedures.
腰椎管狭窄症(LSCS)是老年人群中一种常见的退行性肌肉骨骼疾病。虽然减压手术是标准治疗方法,但一些患者需要翻修手术。椎间盘膨出是退变过程中与椎间盘突出不同的一个明显组成部分,会导致椎管狭窄。然而,其对LSCS手术效果的影响从未被研究过。本研究旨在阐明椎间盘膨出对LSCS减压手术效果的影响,填补这一关键的知识空白。
这项回顾性研究分析了517例连续接受LSCS减压手术的患者的临床数据,涉及912个椎间隙。我们对椎间盘膨出与翻修手术之间的关联进行了统计学评估。采用两种方法评估椎间盘膨出:椎间盘扩展面积(EAD),指椎间盘的水平扩展;椎间盘膨出长度(DBL),表示椎间盘向椎管内侵入的程度。还评估了其他传统影像学评估和患者背景特征。
28例患者(5.4%)涉及31个椎间隙(3.4%)需要翻修手术。需要翻修手术的患者明显更年轻,且更有可能吸烟。与未翻修组相比,翻修组的EAD和DBL均显著更高(两者P均<0.001)。我们未观察到其他传统影像学评估与翻修手术之间的关联。多变量分析显示,EAD和DBL与翻修手术独立相关。
本研究表明,椎间盘膨出,尤其是通过EAD测量的,是LSCS减压术后翻修手术的重要预测指标。这些发现凸显了术前评估椎间盘膨出在预测手术效果和优化减压手术患者选择方面的重要性。