Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse Zürich, Switzerland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 May 1;48(9):610-616. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004584. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
Proper patient selection is crucial for the outcome of surgically treated degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Nevertheless, there is still not a clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment option for patients with DLSS.
To investigate the treatment failure rate and introduce a simple, preoperative score to aid surgical decision-making.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective observational study.
Four hundred forty-five patients who underwent surgical decompression for DLSS.
Treatment failure (defined as conversion to a fusion of a previously decompressed level) of lumbar decompression.
Several risk factors associated with worse outcomes and treatment failures, such as age, body mass index, smoking status, previous surgery, low back pain (LBP), facet joint effusion, disk degeneration, fatty infiltration of the paraspinal muscles, the presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis and the facet angulation, were investigated.
At a mean follow-up of 44±31 months, 6.5% (29/445) of the patients underwent revision surgery with spinal fusion at an average of 3±9 months following the lumbar decompression due to low back or leg pain. The baseline LBP (≥7) [odds ratio (OR)=5.4, P <0.001], the presence of facet joint effusion (>2 mm) in magnetic resonance imaging (OR=4.2, P <0.001), and disk degeneration (Pfirrmann >4) (OR=3.2, P =0.03) were associated with an increased risk for treatment failure following decompression for DLSS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that a score≥6 points yielded a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 64% for predicting a treatment failure following lumbar decompression for DLSS in the present cohort.
The newly introduced score quantifying amounts of LBP, facet effusions, and disk degeneration, could predict treatment failure and the need for revision surgery for DLSS patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion. Patients with scores >6 have a high chance of needing fusion following decompression surgery.
Retrospective observational study, Level III.
对于手术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)患者,正确的患者选择对治疗结果至关重要。然而,对于 DLSS 患者的最佳治疗选择,仍没有明确的共识。
研究治疗失败率,并引入一个简单的术前评分来辅助手术决策。
研究设计/设置:回顾性观察性研究。
445 例接受手术减压治疗 DLSS 的患者。
腰椎减压术后治疗失败(定义为先前减压水平的融合转换)。
研究了与较差结局和治疗失败相关的几个风险因素,如年龄、体重指数、吸烟状况、既往手术、下腰痛(LBP)、小关节突关节积液、椎间盘退变、椎旁肌肉脂肪浸润、退行性腰椎滑脱和小关节角的存在。
在平均 44±31 个月的随访中,由于下腰痛或腿痛,6.5%(29/445)的患者在腰椎减压后平均 3±9 个月接受了翻修手术和脊柱融合。基线 LBP(≥7)[比值比(OR)=5.4,P <0.001]、磁共振成像(MRI)中小关节突关节积液(>2 毫米)(OR=4.2,P <0.001)和椎间盘退变(Pfirrmann >4)(OR=3.2,P =0.03)与 DLSS 减压后治疗失败的风险增加相关。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,在本队列中,评分≥6 分对预测 DLSS 患者腰椎减压后治疗失败的敏感性为 90%,特异性为 64%。
新引入的评分量化了 LBP、小关节突关节积液和椎间盘退变的程度,可以预测 DLSS 患者接受腰椎减压而不融合的治疗失败和需要翻修手术的情况。评分>6 的患者在减压手术后融合的可能性很高。
回顾性观察性研究,III 级。