Balaban C D, Weinstein J M
Brain Res. 1985 Nov 11;347(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90888-1.
Three components of pre-saccadic evoked potentials have been identified in humans: a slow negative shift (SNS), a positive antecedent potential (AP) and a spike potential (SP). This study examined the influences of: instructions to the subject to make saccades; the presence of a visual target; and the direction of the saccades on the amplitude of the averaged SP, which was recorded from P3 and P4 (International 10/20 System) in 20 normal, right-handed subjects. Recordings were made for spontaneous saccades prior to receiving instructions in six subjects. Twenty subjects performed self-paced saccades in the presence of a 10 degrees visual target (two red LEDs) and while blindfolded in a dark room. The SP was either absent or grossly altered (broadened) for spontaneous saccades in an illuminated room; it was robust for self-paced saccades in light or darkness. Three-way analysis of variance revealed a highly significant cortical laterality (P3 vs P4) X saccade direction interaction (P less than 0.001), reflecting that for a given saccade direction, the SP was larger over the contralateral recording site for the self-paced light (SPL) paradigm (Newman-Keuls test). In the self-paced dark (SPD) paradigm, though, this was only true for saccades to the right. By contrast, scatter plots of the directional indices (D.I. = [(SP for contralateral) - (SP for ipsilateral)]/[(SP for contralateral) + (SP for ipsilateral saccades)] for left (P3) and right (P4) recording sites from individual subjects revealed a significant negative correlation for both SPL (r = 0.78) and SPD (r = 0.74) paradigms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
慢负向偏移(SNS)、正向先行电位(AP)和峰电位(SP)。本研究考察了以下因素的影响:对受试者进行扫视的指令;视觉目标的存在;以及扫视方向对平均SP波幅的影响,该平均SP是在20名正常右利手受试者的P3和P4(国际10/20系统)部位记录的。对6名受试者在接受指令前的自发扫视进行了记录。20名受试者在有一个10度视觉目标(两个红色发光二极管)的情况下以及在暗室中蒙眼时进行了自主节奏扫视。在明亮房间中,自发扫视时SP要么不存在,要么严重改变(变宽);在明或暗环境下的自主节奏扫视时,SP则很稳定。三因素方差分析显示出高度显著的皮质侧别(P3与P4)×扫视方向交互作用(P<0.001),这表明对于给定的扫视方向,在自主节奏明视(SPL)范式中,对侧记录部位的SP更大(纽曼-基尔斯检验)。然而,在自主节奏暗视(SPD)范式中,仅向右的扫视才是如此。相比之下,对个体受试者左(P3)、右(P4)记录部位的方向指数[方向指数(D.I.)=[(对侧的SP)-(同侧的SP)]/[(对侧的SP)+(同侧扫视的SP)]]散点图显示,SPL(r = 0.78)和SPD(r = 0.74)范式均存在显著负相关。(摘要截短于250字)