García-Muñoz Cristina, Cortés-Vega María-Dolores, Heredia-Rizo Alberto Marcos, Martín-Valero Rocío, García-Bernal María-Isabel, Casuso-Holgado María Jesús
Department of Physiotherapy, University School Fco. Maldonado, Avd. de los Cipreses s/n, 41640 Osuna, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, C/Avicena s/n, 41009 Seville, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 21;9(2):590. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020590.
Postural instability and dizziness are commonly observed in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for the use of vestibular rehabilitation, in comparison with other exercise interventions or no intervention, to treat balance impairments and dizziness in PwMS. An electronic search was conducted by two independent reviewers in the following databases: MEDLINE (Pubmed), Scopus, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Web of Science (WOS), Lilacs, CINHAL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). A quality assessment was performed using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. When possible, the data were pooled in a meta-analysis (95%CI). This systematic review followed the PRISMA guideline statement and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019134230). Seven studies were included, with a total of 321 participants analysed. Compared with no intervention, vestibular rehabilitation was more effective for balance development (SMD = 2.12; 95% CI = 0.49, 3.75; = 0.01; I = 89%) and dizziness symptoms improvement (SMD = -17.43; 95% CI = -29.99, -4.87; = 0.007; I= 66%). Compared with other exercise interventions, improvements in favour of the experimental group were observed, but statistical significance for the differences between groups was not reached.
姿势不稳和头晕在多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)中很常见。本系统评价的目的是评估与其他运动干预措施或不进行干预相比,使用前庭康复治疗PwMS平衡障碍和头晕的证据。两名独立评价者在以下数据库中进行了电子检索:MEDLINE(PubMed)、Scopus、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)、科学网(WOS)、Lilacs、CINHAL和Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)。使用PEDro量表和Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。如有可能,将数据汇总进行荟萃分析(95%CI)。本系统评价遵循PRISMA指南声明,并在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42019134230)中注册。纳入了7项研究,共分析了321名参与者。与不进行干预相比,前庭康复在平衡发展方面更有效(标准化均数差=2.12;95%CI=0.49,3.75;P=0.01;I²=89%),在改善头晕症状方面也更有效(标准化均数差=-17.43;95%CI=-29.99,-4.87;P=0.007;I²=66%)。与其他运动干预措施相比,观察到有利于实验组的改善,但未达到组间差异的统计学显著性。