Mailhot Tanya, Bouaouina Zineb, Khetir Imène, Gélinas Céline, Brouillette Judith, Roussy Claudie, Jarry Stéphanie, Lavoie Patrick
Montreal Heart Institute Research Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Faculty of Nursing and Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Can J Nurs Res. 2025 Sep;57(3):460-470. doi: 10.1177/08445621251350027. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
BackgroundDelirium is a common yet underdiagnosed condition in hospitalized older adults, particularly challenging to detect early in cardiology settings. Although delirium assessment tools improve detection rates, observations by family caregivers of patients' cognitive changes can offer valuable insights, supplementing assessments by healthcare professionals. However, validated French-language tools for family caregivers to assess delirium in acute care settings in Canada are lacking.PurposeTranslate, culturally adapt, and validate the Family Confusion Assessment Method for French-speaking cardiovascular patients and their caregivers (FAM-CAM-Fr).MethodsThe translation and cultural adaptation of the FAM-CAM were conducted following the guidelines of Sousa and Rojjanasrirat (2011). Criterion validation involved 100 dyads of family caregivers and hospitalized cardiovascular patients. The FAM-CAM-Fr's performance was assessed by comparing it to the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for delirium. Measures of sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with the CAM were calculated.ResultsThe FAM-CAM-Fr showed high specificity (92.6%) but low sensitivity (58%) in detecting delirium. Cohen's Kappa indicated a moderate agreement (>0.50) between the FAM-CAM-Fr and the CAM. Despite family caregivers using the tool without prior training, indicating its usability in real-world settings, sensitivity was lower compared to studies that included caregiver training, though specificity was similar.ConclusionThe FAM-CAM-Fr is promising as a specific tool for screening delirium in cardiovascular patients. Despite its low sensitivity, its high specificity indicates that it is effective at ruling out delirium. Future research should focus on further validation across various settings.
背景
谵妄在住院老年人中很常见,但却常常被漏诊,在心脏病学环境中早期检测尤其具有挑战性。尽管谵妄评估工具提高了检测率,但家庭护理人员对患者认知变化的观察可以提供有价值的见解,补充医疗保健专业人员的评估。然而,在加拿大,缺乏经过验证的法语工具供家庭护理人员在急性护理环境中评估谵妄。
目的
翻译、文化调适并验证适用于说法语的心血管疾病患者及其护理人员的家庭谵妄评估方法(FAM-CAM-Fr)。
方法
FAM-CAM的翻译和文化调适遵循Sousa和Rojjanasrirat(2011年)的指南进行。标准验证涉及100对家庭护理人员和住院心血管疾病患者。通过将FAM-CAM-Fr与谵妄评估方法(CAM)和谵妄的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)诊断标准进行比较,评估其性能。计算了敏感性、特异性以及与CAM的一致性指标。
结果
FAM-CAM-Fr在检测谵妄方面显示出高特异性(92.6%)但低敏感性(58%)。Cohen's Kappa表明FAM-CAM-Fr与CAM之间存在中度一致性(>0.50)。尽管家庭护理人员在没有事先培训的情况下使用该工具,表明其在现实环境中的可用性,但与包括护理人员培训的研究相比,敏感性较低,不过特异性相似。
结论
FAM-CAM-Fr有望成为筛查心血管疾病患者谵妄的一种特异性工具。尽管其敏感性较低,但其高特异性表明它在排除谵妄方面是有效的。未来的研究应侧重于在各种环境中进行进一步验证。