• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活体供肾肾切除术的优化手术效果:采用新技术的单中心250例经验

Optimized Surgical Outcomes in Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience with 250 Cases Using a Novel Technique.

作者信息

Huseynov Amil

机构信息

Department of Transplantation, Medicana Hospital, İstanbul Türkiye.

Beykoz University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul,Türkiye.

出版信息

Urol Res Pract. 2025 Jun 4;51(2):77-81. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.25030.

DOI:10.5152/tud.2025.25030
PMID:40528689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12208922/
Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has become a standard of care for living kidney donors, providing reduced morbidity, quicker recovery, and enhanced patient satisfaction compared with open techniques. This study evaluates a modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy technique designed to minimize colon mobilization while optimizing visualization, thereby improving donor outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 250 consecutive living donor nephrectomies performed by a single surgeon between March 2022 and March 2024 was conducted. All donors underwent preoperative imaging (3D computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography). The modified approach avoided splenic flexure dissection and introduced early ligation of the adrenal vein. We analyzed intraoperative parameters (operative time, estimated blood loss, complications) and postoperative measures (hospital stay, pain scores, complication rates, satisfaction) were analyzed. Results: The mean operative time was 72.8 ± 16.2 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 100 ± 40 mL. No conversions to open surgery or intraoperative transfusions were required. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.0 ± 1.0 days. Postoperative pain (mean Visual Analog Scale [VAS] 2.5 ± 1.8) was low, and major vascular injury occurred in 0.8% of cases. Wound infection and incisional hernia rates were each 0.8%. Patient satisfaction was high (Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire [PSQ] 3.3 ± 1.4), indicating favorable perceptions of comfort and outcomes. Conclusion: This modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy technique is safe, effective, and associated with enhanced patient comfort and reduced complications. The findings underscore its potential to improve donor experiences, potentially expanding the living donor pool. Further investigations should confirm these outcomes over a longer follow-up period.

摘要

目的

与开放手术技术相比,腹腔镜供肾切除术已成为活体肾供者的标准治疗方法,具有发病率降低、恢复更快和患者满意度提高的优点。本研究评估了一种改良的腹腔镜供肾切除术技术,该技术旨在尽量减少结肠游离,同时优化视野,从而改善供者的手术效果。方法:对2022年3月至2024年3月期间由一名外科医生连续进行的250例活体供肾切除术进行横断面研究。所有供者均接受术前影像学检查(三维计算机断层扫描和计算机断层血管造影)。改良方法避免了脾曲解剖,并提前结扎肾上腺静脉。我们分析了术中参数(手术时间、估计失血量、并发症)和术后指标(住院时间、疼痛评分、并发症发生率、满意度)。结果:平均手术时间为72.8±16.2分钟,估计失血量为100±40毫升。无需转为开放手术或术中输血。平均住院时间为2.0±1.0天。术后疼痛较轻(平均视觉模拟评分[VAS]为2.5±1.8),0.8%的病例发生了主要血管损伤。伤口感染和切口疝发生率均为0.8%。患者满意度较高(患者满意度问卷[PSQ]为3.3±1.4),表明对舒适度和手术效果的评价良好。结论:这种改良的腹腔镜供肾切除术技术安全、有效,且能提高患者舒适度并减少并发症。这些发现强调了其改善供者体验的潜力,可能会扩大活体供者库。进一步的研究应在更长的随访期内证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/473f/12208922/61ef92c2d00a/urp-51-2-77_f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/473f/12208922/ecf6e1fb04a7/urp-51-2-77_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/473f/12208922/ef3a707c804f/urp-51-2-77_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/473f/12208922/61ef92c2d00a/urp-51-2-77_f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/473f/12208922/ecf6e1fb04a7/urp-51-2-77_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/473f/12208922/ef3a707c804f/urp-51-2-77_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/473f/12208922/61ef92c2d00a/urp-51-2-77_f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimized Surgical Outcomes in Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience with 250 Cases Using a Novel Technique.活体供肾肾切除术的优化手术效果:采用新技术的单中心250例经验
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Jun 4;51(2):77-81. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.25030.
2
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
3
Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN) versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.经腹腔镜单孔供体肾切除术(LESS-DN)与标准腹腔镜供体肾切除术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 27;2016(5):CD010850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010850.pub2.
4
What Are the Recurrence Rates, Complications, and Functional Outcomes After Multiportal Arthroscopic Synovectomy for Patients With Knee Diffuse-type Tenosynovial Giant-cell Tumors?膝关节弥漫型腱鞘巨细胞瘤患者行多入路关节镜下滑膜切除术的复发率、并发症及功能结局如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1218-1229. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002934. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
5
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.
6
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
7
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
8
Intracavity lavage and wound irrigation for prevention of surgical site infection.腔内灌洗和伤口冲洗预防手术部位感染
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD012234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012234.pub2.
9
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
10
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术老年患者术后认知结局:静脉麻醉维持与吸入麻醉维持的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Challenges, Outcomes and Success Strategies.腹腔镜供肾切除术简介:挑战、结果与成功策略
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2021;12(1):23-31.
2
Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Single-Center Experience of 200 Consecutive Cases.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:200 例连续病例的单中心经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):627-631. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0545. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Chronic pain after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.手助腹腔镜供肾切术后慢性疼痛。
Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):711-719. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11127. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy of Dual Renal Artery Kidneys: Single Center Experience.双肾动脉肾脏的腹腔镜供肾切除术:单中心经验
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Mar-Apr;112(2):124-129. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.2.124.
5
Laparoscopic open donor nephrectomy: Lessons learnt from single academic center experience.腹腔镜下开放供肾切除术:单学术中心经验教训
World J Nephrol. 2017 Jan 6;6(1):45-52. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v6.i1.45.
6
The impact of the donors' and recipients' medical complications on living kidney donors' mental health.供体和受体的医学并发症对活体肾供体心理健康的影响。
Transpl Int. 2016 May;29(5):589-602. doi: 10.1111/tri.12760. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Challenges of organ shortage for transplantation: solutions and opportunities.器官移植供体短缺的挑战:解决方案与机遇。
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2014;5(3):87-96.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relation between body mass index and short-term donor outcome of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析体重指数与腹腔镜供肾切取术短期供者结局的关系。
Kidney Int. 2013 May;83(5):931-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.485. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation.活体肾捐献术后围手术期死亡率和长期生存情况。
JAMA. 2010 Mar 10;303(10):959-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.237.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性供肾切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):851-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05415.x.