• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加农场规模是减少奶牛养殖碳足迹的有效途径。

Increasing farm size is an effective way to decrease the carbon footprint in dairy cattle production.

机构信息

Isparta Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry, Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Isparta, Türkiye.

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Isparta, Türkiye.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Nov 27;55(6):421. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03837-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11250-023-03837-4
PMID:38010571
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the farm size on the carbon footprint of dairy cattle farms in Isparta province in Türkiye. For this purpose, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 159 farms which represent 1866 dairy cattle farms in Isparta province. The number of animals on the farm was converted into animal unit (AU) and the farms were divided into three groups. Accordingly, farms were classified as small, medium, and large farms. The carbon footprint produced per AU in the farm was the sum of feed, enteric fermentation, CH from manure, CO from manure, NO from manure, and anthropogenic emissions. The milk produced in the farms was standardized according to 4% fat and 3.3% protein (FPCM) and the ratio of meat to milk was found by dividing the total live weight gain produced except for cows by FPCM. Accordingly, 65% of the greenhouse gas emissions of dairy farms were allocated to milk and 35% to meat. Of the total emissions, enteric fermentation and emission on feed contributed the highest proportion. Results showed that when using the IPCC (2021) global warming potential (GWP) values, the carbon footprint for 1 kg of FPCM milk was 1.26 kg CO-eq on average, whereas the carbon footprint for 1 kg of meat was 11.78 kg CO-eq on average. Results showed that as farm size increased carbon footprint for a kilogram of FPCM and meat decreased and this showed the effectiveness of farm size on decreasing carbon footprint per unit of product.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨农场规模对土耳其伊斯帕塔省奶牛场碳足迹的影响。为此,对伊斯帕塔省 159 个农场进行了面对面访谈,这些农场代表了该省 1866 个奶牛场。农场中的动物数量被转换为动物单位(AU),并将农场分为三组。相应地,农场被分为小型、中型和大型农场。农场每 AU 产生的碳足迹是饲料、瘤胃发酵、粪肥中的 CH、粪肥中的 CO、粪肥中的 NO 和人为排放的总和。农场生产的牛奶根据 4%脂肪和 3.3%蛋白质(FPCM)进行标准化,通过将除奶牛外的总活体重增加除以 FPCM,得出肉与奶的比例。因此,奶牛场温室气体排放的 65%分配给牛奶,35%分配给肉类。在总排放量中,瘤胃发酵和饲料排放对温室气体排放的贡献最大。结果表明,使用 IPCC(2021)全球升温潜能值(GWP)时,每公斤 FPCM 牛奶的碳足迹平均为 1.26 公斤 CO-eq,而每公斤肉的碳足迹平均为 11.78 公斤 CO-eq。结果表明,随着农场规模的增加,每公斤 FPCM 和肉的碳足迹减少,这表明农场规模对降低单位产品碳足迹的有效性。

相似文献

1
Increasing farm size is an effective way to decrease the carbon footprint in dairy cattle production.增加农场规模是减少奶牛养殖碳足迹的有效途径。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Nov 27;55(6):421. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03837-4.
2
Assessment of carbon footprint of milk production and identification of its major determinants in smallholder dairy farms in Karnataka, India.评估印度卡纳塔克邦小农牛奶生产的碳足迹,并确定其主要决定因素。
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Dec;106(12):8847-8860. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22153. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Impact of nitrate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on the carbon footprints of milk from cattle produced in confined-feeding systems across regions in the United States: A life cycle analysis.硝酸盐和3-硝基氧丙醇对美国不同地区集约化饲养系统中奶牛所产牛奶碳足迹的影响:生命周期分析。
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jun;105(6):5074-5083. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20988. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
4
Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.新西兰奶山羊奶生产的碳足迹
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4279-93. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9104. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia.理解埃塞俄比亚中高原小农户奶牛场碳足迹的变异性。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Dec 2;54(6):411. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03379-1.
6
A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.高产封闭式奶牛场和草地奶牛场牛奶碳足迹的案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1835-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
7
Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance.将爱尔兰奶牛场牛奶的碳足迹与经济绩效联系起来。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Oct;98(10):7394-407. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9222. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
8
Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk.新西兰牛奶碳足迹的时间、空间和管理变异性。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jan;103(1):1031-1046. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17182. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.通过粪污厌氧消化缓解牛奶生产的环境影响:以波河谷的一个奶牛场为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 May 15;481:196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
10
Impact of smallholder cattle farms on the environment: a study.小农牛场对环境的影响:一项研究。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Jun 12;55(4):236. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03652-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of smallholder cattle farms on the environment: a study.小农牛场对环境的影响:一项研究。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Jun 12;55(4):236. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03652-x.
2
Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia.理解埃塞俄比亚中高原小农户奶牛场碳足迹的变异性。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Dec 2;54(6):411. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03379-1.
3
The cost and profitability analysis of different dairy farm sizes.不同规模奶牛场的成本和盈利分析。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Sep 24;54(5):320. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03321-5.
4
Current state of enteric methane and the carbon footprint of beef and dairy cattle in the United States.美国牛肠道甲烷的现状以及牛肉和奶牛的碳足迹
Anim Front. 2021 Sep 6;11(4):57-68. doi: 10.1093/af/vfab043. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms.对奶牛场温室气体排放进行建模。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jul;101(7):6675-6690. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13272. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
6
The carbon footprint of integrated milk production and renewable energy systems - A case study.集成牛奶生产和可再生能源系统的碳足迹 - 案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;609:1286-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.271. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
7
Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.新西兰奶山羊奶生产的碳足迹
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4279-93. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9104. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
The Contribution of Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use activities to Global Warming, 1990-2012.1990 - 2012年农业、林业及其他土地利用活动对全球变暖的影响
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jul;21(7):2655-2660. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12865. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
9
A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.高产封闭式奶牛场和草地奶牛场牛奶碳足迹的案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1835-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
10
Anti-methanogenic effects of monensin in dairy and beef cattle: a meta-analysis.莫能菌素对奶牛和肉牛的抗甲烷作用:一项荟萃分析。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Aug;96(8):5161-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5923. Epub 2013 Jun 13.