Salerno Laura, Fortunato Lucia, Ostwald Vivian, Muscolino Arianna, Lo Coco Gianluca
Department of Psychology, Educational Sciences and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Italy.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0323320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323320. eCollection 2025.
There is still no scientific consensus on the relationship between problematic social media use and its negative consequences for adolescents' well-being. This study aims to identify common trajectories of problematic social media use over time in a sample of adolescents, and to identify the demographic and psychological factors associated with different empirical profiles. This four-wave longitudinal study involved 403 adolescents (age range: 13-18 years; Mage = 15.73 ± 1.22; 51.9% females). Participants provided demographic and social media use data (i.e., social media addiction, frequency of social media activities, time spent on Instagram and TikTok) as well as measures of psychological factors (i.e., psychological distress, emotion dysregulation, self-esteem, perceived social support, online social comparison). Parallel latent class growth analysis (LCGA) categorised participants into three classes. Participants in class 1 ('most vulnerable group'; 25.56%) showed a more impaired functioning profile, with a stable problematic pattern of social media use (i.e., high levels of social media addiction and time spent on TikTok). Multinomial regression models showed that factors associated with this pattern were low social support, high online social comparison, and SMU intensity. Our findings suggest that the role of social interactions (both online and offline) and social comparison tendencies should be further explored as markers of problematic social media use.
关于有问题的社交媒体使用与其对青少年幸福感的负面影响之间的关系,目前仍未达成科学共识。本研究旨在确定青少年样本中随着时间推移有问题的社交媒体使用的常见轨迹,并确定与不同实证概况相关的人口统计学和心理因素。这项四波纵向研究涉及403名青少年(年龄范围:13 - 18岁;平均年龄 = 15.73 ± 1.22;51.9%为女性)。参与者提供了人口统计学和社交媒体使用数据(即社交媒体成瘾、社交媒体活动频率、在Instagram和TikTok上花费的时间)以及心理因素的测量数据(即心理困扰、情绪调节障碍、自尊、感知到的社会支持、在线社会比较)。平行潜在类别增长分析(LCGA)将参与者分为三类。第1类参与者(“最脆弱群体”;25.56%)表现出功能受损更严重的概况,具有稳定的有问题的社交媒体使用模式(即高水平的社交媒体成瘾和在TikTok上花费的时间)。多项回归模型表明,与这种模式相关的因素是低社会支持、高在线社会比较和社交媒体使用强度。我们的研究结果表明,应进一步探索社会互动(包括线上和线下)和社会比较倾向作为有问题的社交媒体使用标志的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-1-29
Autism Adulthood. 2025-5-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-4
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-7-25
J Med Internet Res. 2023-5-10
Addict Behav Rep. 2022-12-6
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023-3