Herman William H, Ciarleglio Adam, Callaghan Brian C, Edelstein Sharon L, Goldberg Ronald, White Neil H, Albers James W
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Biostatistics Center and Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD.
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.2337/dc25-0596.
The clinical presentation, symptoms, and signs of neuropathy vary substantially. We determined whether painful neuropathic symptoms and distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) were associated with different risk factors in a longitudinal study of Diabetes Prevention Program/Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPP/DPPOS) participants.
We assessed neuropathy in 1,779 DPP/DPPOS participants ∼21 years after DPP randomization. Symptoms were assessed using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) questionnaire and signs using pinprick, vibration, and monofilament testing. We defined four mutually exclusive neuropathy phenotypes: 1) no symptoms or signs of DSPN, 2) neuropathic pain without signs, 3) other neurologic symptoms without pain or signs, and 4) DSPN (MNSI questionnaire score ≥4 or any signs). We used multinomial logistic regression models to compare nonglycemic and glycemic risk factors among participants to better understand risk factors associated with painful neuropathic symptoms and DSPN.
Among the participants, 501 (28%) had no symptoms or signs, 144 (8%) had painful neuropathic symptoms without signs, and 473 (27%) had DSPN. Compared with participants with neither symptoms nor signs, those with painful neuropathic symptoms were more likely to be women, to have greater weight, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. Painful symptoms were not associated with glycemia. In contrast, DSPN, when compared with painful symptoms, was associated with older age, White race, and glycemic exposure.
In this cohort, risk factors for painful neuropathic symptoms and DSPN differed. Improved recognition of painful neuropathic symptoms and better consensus on diagnostic criteria may facilitate research into their causes, prevention, and treatment.
神经病变的临床表现、症状和体征差异很大。在糖尿病预防计划/糖尿病预防计划结局研究(DPP/DPPOS)参与者的纵向研究中,我们确定了疼痛性神经病变症状和远端对称性多发性神经病变(DSPN)是否与不同的危险因素相关。
我们在DPP随机分组约21年后评估了1779名DPP/DPPOS参与者的神经病变情况。使用密歇根神经病变筛查工具(MNSI)问卷评估症状,使用针刺、振动和单丝测试评估体征。我们定义了四种相互排斥的神经病变表型:1)无DSPN症状或体征;2)有神经病变疼痛但无体征;3)有其他神经症状但无疼痛或体征;4)DSPN(MNSI问卷评分≥4或有任何体征)。我们使用多项逻辑回归模型比较参与者中的非血糖和血糖危险因素,以更好地了解与疼痛性神经病变症状和DSPN相关的危险因素。
在参与者中,501人(28%)无症状或体征,144人(8%)有疼痛性神经病变症状但无体征,473人(27%)有DSPN。与既无症状也无体征的参与者相比,有疼痛性神经病变症状的参与者更可能为女性、体重更大且估计肾小球滤过率更低。疼痛症状与血糖无关。相比之下,与疼痛症状相比,DSPN与年龄较大、白种人和血糖暴露相关。
在这个队列中,疼痛性神经病变症状和DSPN的危险因素不同。更好地识别疼痛性神经病变症状并在诊断标准上达成更好的共识可能有助于对其病因、预防和治疗的研究。