Herrero Babiloni Alberto, Sangalli Linda, Puertas-Cuesta F Javier, Morin Charles M, Lavigne Gilles J, Fabbro Cibele Dal
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Department of Stomatology, CIUSSS, Montréal, QC, Canada.
College of Dental Medicine, Midwestern University, 3450 Lacey Rd, Downers Grove, IL, 60515, USA.
Sleep Med. 2025 Sep;133:106633. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106633. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
Orexin antagonists are newer medications for management of insomnia, a condition frequently associated to chronic pain. This systematic review evaluates the effects of orexin receptor antagonists on pain perception and pain-related outcomes in humans, considering their role in both sleep regulation and pain modulation.
A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included human participants with acute or chronic pain who received orexin receptor antagonists (e.g., suvorexant, lemborexant, daridorexant, filorexant) with pain intensity, pain thresholds, sleep disturbances, and functional outcomes as primary measures. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-E for observational studies, while the GRADE approach was applied to assess the overall certainty of evidence.
Out of 488 identified records, four studies met the inclusion criteria (three RCTs, one observational study), totaling 331 participants. No significant improvements in pain intensity were found, though one study observed increased pain sensitivity thresholds in fibromyalgia patients. Conversely, orexin receptor antagonists consistently improved sleep parameters, including total sleep time and sleep onset latency. Evidence certainty was moderate for RCTs and low for the observational study, with imprecision and publication bias as key concerns.
Orexin receptor antagonists improve sleep, but due to the very limited number of studies and small sample sizes, evidence regarding analgesic effects in humans remains inconclusive. The lack of receptor-selective interventions, short treatment durations, and pain condition variability may contribute to these findings. Future trials should investigate mechanistic analgesic effects, receptor-specific therapies, and explore orexin's role in pain phenotypes.
食欲素拮抗剂是用于治疗失眠的新型药物,失眠常与慢性疼痛相关。本系统评价评估了食欲素受体拮抗剂对人类疼痛感知和疼痛相关结局的影响,同时考虑了它们在睡眠调节和疼痛调制中的作用。
按照PRISMA指南,在PubMed、科学网、Scopus、CINAHL、PsycINFO和ClinicalTrials.gov中进行检索。符合条件的研究包括患有急性或慢性疼痛的人类参与者,他们接受食欲素受体拮抗剂(如苏沃雷生、伦博雷生、达利雷生、非洛雷生),以疼痛强度、疼痛阈值、睡眠障碍和功能结局作为主要测量指标。使用RoB 2评估随机对照试验(RCT)的偏倚风险,使用ROBINS-E评估观察性研究的偏倚风险,同时应用GRADE方法评估证据的总体确定性。
在488条识别记录中,四项研究符合纳入标准(三项RCT,一项观察性研究),共331名参与者。未发现疼痛强度有显著改善,不过一项研究观察到纤维肌痛患者的疼痛敏感性阈值有所提高。相反,食欲素受体拮抗剂持续改善睡眠参数,包括总睡眠时间和入睡潜伏期。RCT的证据确定性为中等,观察性研究的证据确定性为低,主要问题是不精确性和发表偏倚。
食欲素受体拮抗剂可改善睡眠,但由于研究数量非常有限且样本量较小,关于其对人类镇痛作用的证据仍然不确定。缺乏受体选择性干预、治疗持续时间短以及疼痛状况的变异性可能导致了这些结果。未来的试验应研究机械性镇痛作用、受体特异性疗法,并探索食欲素在疼痛表型中的作用。