De Mauro Domenico, Capece Giacomo, Covino Marcello, Russo Andrea, Salini Sara, El Ezzo Omar, Bosco Francesco, Maccauro Giulio, Vitiello Raffele
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 18;35(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04403-4.
Periprosthetic femur fractures around the hip represent a significant clinical challenge, particularly in patients aged 65 and older, as delayed treatment can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Early surgical intervention is generally recommended to minimize complications and optimize functional recovery. This study aims to assess the impact of surgical timing on operative duration, hospitalization length, complication rates, and long-term survival in elderly patients with periprosthetic femur fractures.
A retrospective observational study followed STROBE guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with periprosthetic femur fractures treated surgically between 2014 and 2022 were included. Patients were stratified into two groups based on surgical timing: Early Surgery (< 24 h) and Delayed Surgery (≥ 24 h). Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale, while medical condition severity was evaluated with the National Early Warning Score. Primary outcomes included operative time, hospitalization length, complications, and survival. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, chi-squared tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with significance at p < 0.05.
Seventy-two patients were analyzed. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Early Surgery group (145 ± 49.6 min) compared to the Delayed Surgery group (176 ± 71.9 min; p < 0.001). Hospitalization duration was also reduced in the Early Surgery group (12.1 ± 5.98 days vs. 19.7 ± 13.2 days; p = 0.002). Survival analysis demonstrated significantly better long-term outcomes in the Early Surgery group (p = 0.036), with 10-year survival rates of 92.8% versus 68.2%.
Early surgical intervention (< 24 h) in elderly patients with periprosthetic femur fractures is associated with shorter operative time, reduced hospitalization, and improved long-term survival compared to delayed surgery. Prompt surgical management should be prioritized to enhance patient outcomes.
髋关节周围的股骨假体周围骨折是一项重大的临床挑战,尤其是在65岁及以上的患者中,因为延迟治疗会导致发病率和死亡率增加。一般建议早期手术干预,以尽量减少并发症并优化功能恢复。本研究旨在评估手术时机对老年股骨假体周围骨折患者手术时间、住院时间、并发症发生率和长期生存率的影响。
一项回顾性观察研究遵循了STROBE指南和《赫尔辛基宣言》。纳入2014年至2022年间接受手术治疗的年龄≥65岁的股骨假体周围骨折患者。根据手术时机将患者分为两组:早期手术(<24小时)和延迟手术(≥24小时)。使用临床衰弱量表评估衰弱程度,同时用国家早期预警评分评估病情严重程度。主要结局包括手术时间、住院时间、并发症和生存率。采用t检验、卡方检验和Kaplan-Meier生存分析进行统计分析,p<0.05具有显著性。
分析了72例患者。早期手术组的平均手术时间(145±49.6分钟)明显短于延迟手术组(176±7l.9分钟;p<0.001)。早期手术组的住院时间也缩短了(12.1±5.98天对19.7±13.2天;p=0.002)。生存分析显示早期手术组的长期结局明显更好(p=0.036),10年生存率分别为92.8%和68.2%。
与延迟手术相比,老年股骨假体周围骨折患者早期手术干预(<24小时)与手术时间缩短、住院时间减少和长期生存率提高相关。应优先进行及时的手术管理以改善患者结局。