Jolejole Mark Edward, Uchida Mai, Itakura Ayane, Tobino Tomohiro, Sei Kazunari, Nakajima Fumiyuki
Department of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Collaborative Research Institute for Innovative Microbiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Water Environ Res. 2025 Jun;97(6):e70107. doi: 10.1002/wer.70107.
In urban environments, runoff may contain environmental DNA (eDNA) from nuisance animals, but its potential has not been investigated. Conventional eDNA methods, such as water sampling, may not be applicable to the detection of nuisance animals in urban areas due to the scarcity of target eDNA attributable to the sporadic contact of the animals with water sources, and the limited volume of samples collected may lead to false negative results. Given these limitations, this study aimed to develop a passive sampling method for the collection of runoff solids for the detection of rodents (mouse and rat) in urban areas using eDNA. The developed sampling method successfully collected 0.3-16.7 g dry weight of runoff solids per sampling event. Collected runoff samples contained 8.0-58.1 μg total DNA/g dry weight sample and were characterized by the presence of PCR inhibitors. Following the removal of these inhibitors, mouse eDNA was detected (albeit below the limit of quantification) using a designed species-specific assay. The results of this study demonstrate that runoff solids are a viable eDNA source for the detection of animals in urban environments. However, further work is required to improve the quantification of target DNA. Nevertheless, the developed methodology may provide new and important information on the ecology of animals in urban spaces that can be incorporated into the management of nuisance animals in urban areas. SUMMARY: A passive sampling scheme was successfully designed and captured 0.3-16.7 g dry weight of urban runoff solids in two sites in an urban space. Collected solids contain 8.0-58.1 μg/g of eDNA, which also contain PCR inhibitors which must be removed prior to qPCR. Mouse DNA was detected in six out of 19 samples, but the detections were below the determined quantification limit. This new passive sampling scheme can be applied for terrestrial animal detection in urban spaces to potentially track hidden animals.
在城市环境中,径流可能含有来自有害动物的环境DNA(eDNA),但其潜力尚未得到研究。传统的eDNA方法,如水样采集,可能不适用于城市地区有害动物的检测,因为动物与水源的接触是零星的,导致目标eDNA稀缺,而且采集的样本量有限可能会导致假阴性结果。鉴于这些局限性,本研究旨在开发一种被动采样方法,用于采集径流固体,以利用eDNA检测城市地区的啮齿动物(小鼠和大鼠)。所开发的采样方法每次采样成功收集了0.3 - 16.7克干重的径流固体。收集的径流样本含有8.0 - 58.1微克总DNA/克干重样本,并具有PCR抑制剂的特征。去除这些抑制剂后,使用设计的物种特异性检测方法检测到了小鼠eDNA(尽管低于定量限)。本研究结果表明,径流固体是城市环境中检测动物的可行eDNA来源。然而,需要进一步开展工作来改进目标DNA的定量。尽管如此,所开发的方法可能会提供有关城市空间中动物生态的新的重要信息,可纳入城市地区有害动物的管理中。总结:成功设计了一种被动采样方案,并在城市空间的两个地点采集到了0.3 - 16.7克干重的城市径流固体。收集的固体含有8.0 - 58.1微克/克的eDNA,其中也含有PCR抑制剂,在进行定量PCR之前必须去除。在19个样本中的6个样本中检测到了小鼠DNA,但检测结果低于确定的定量限。这种新的被动采样方案可应用于城市空间中的陆生动物检测,以潜在地追踪隐藏的动物。